These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17055889)

  • 1. Endoscopic removal of the wireless pH monitoring capsule in patients with severe discomfort.
    Prakash C; Jonnalagadda S; Azar R; Clouse RE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Nov; 64(5):828-32. PubMed ID: 17055889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance, tolerability, and symptoms related to prolonged pH monitoring using the Bravo system in Mexico.
    Remes-Troche JM; Ibarra-Palomino J; Carmona-Sánchez RI; Valdovinos MA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Nov; 100(11):2382-6. PubMed ID: 16279888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cold and hot snare endoscopic techniques for removal of the Bravo pH monitoring capsule.
    de Hoyos A; Esparza EA; Loredo ML
    Digestion; 2009; 79(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 19169030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patients with functional heartburn are more likely to report retrosternal discomfort during wireless pH monitoring.
    Lee YC; Wang HP; Chiu HM; Huang SP; Tu CH; Wu MS; Lin JT
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Dec; 62(6):834-41. PubMed ID: 16301022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring.
    Chander B; Hanley-Williams N; Deng Y; Sheth A
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 46(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 21959323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring is better tolerated than the catheter-based technique: results from a randomized cross-over trial.
    Wenner J; Johnsson F; Johansson J; Oberg S
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 17100971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonendoscopic transnasal placement of a wireless capsule for esophageal pH monitoring: feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a manometry-guided procedure.
    Marchese M; Spada C; Iacopini F; Familiari P; Shah SG; Tringali A; Costamagna G
    Endoscopy; 2006 Aug; 38(8):813-8. PubMed ID: 17001571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wireless capsule pH monitoring: does it fulfil all expectations?
    Maerten P; Ortner M; Michetti P; Dorta G
    Digestion; 2007; 76(3-4):235-40. PubMed ID: 18174686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring by using a wireless system: a pilot study in Taiwan.
    Tu CH; Lee YC; Wang HP; Wu MS; Chiu HM; Lin JT
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2004; 51(60):1586-9. PubMed ID: 15532783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and tolerability of the Bravo catheter-free pH capsule in patients between the ages of 4 and 18 years.
    Croffie JM; Fitzgerald JF; Molleston JP; Gupta SK; Corkins MR; Pfefferkorn MD; Lim JR; Steiner SJ; Dadzie SK
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2007 Nov; 45(5):559-63. PubMed ID: 18030233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Novel removable internally fully covered self-expanding metal esophageal stent: feasibility, technique of removal, and tissue response in humans.
    Eloubeidi MA; Lopes TL
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jun; 104(6):1374-81. PubMed ID: 19491851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Efficacy, diagnostic utility and tolerance of intraesophageal pH ambulatory determination with wireless pH-testing monitoring system].
    Carmona-Sánchez R; Solana-Sentíes S
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2004; 69(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 15757154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system.
    Pandolfino JE; Richter JE; Ours T; Guardino JM; Chapman J; Kahrilas PJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Apr; 98(4):740-9. PubMed ID: 12738450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Successful esophageal pH monitoring with Bravo capsule in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease].
    Valdovinos Díaz MA; Remes Troche JM; Ruiz Aguilar JC; Schmulson MJ; Valdovinos-Andraca F
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2004; 69(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 15757153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Management of severe chest pain caused by a Bravo pH monitoring capsule.
    Fischer A; Baier PK; Utzolino S; Hopt UT; Schrag HJ
    Endoscopy; 2008 Sep; 40 Suppl 2():E55-6. PubMed ID: 18633913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wireless pH capsule--yield in clinical practice.
    Roman S; Mion F; Zerbib F; Benamouzig R; Letard JC; Bruley des Varannes S
    Endoscopy; 2012 Mar; 44(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 22275050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopic placement of the small-bowel video capsule by using a capsule endoscope delivery device.
    Holden JP; Dureja P; Pfau PR; Schwartz DC; Reichelderfer M; Judd RH; Danko I; Iyer LV; Gopal DV
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 May; 65(6):842-7. PubMed ID: 17466203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional chest pain responds to biofeedback treatment but functional heartburn does not: what is the difference?
    Shapiro M; Shanani R; Taback H; Abramowich D; Scapa E; Broide E
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Jun; 24(6):708-14. PubMed ID: 22433792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stratification and symptom characteristics of non-erosive reflux disease based on acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux.
    Xiong LS; Chen MH; Lin JK; Hu PJ
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Feb; 23(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 17924953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct visualization of the Bravo pH system to ensure proper deployment.
    Vanderveldt H; Barkin JS
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Jul; 101(7):1672-3; author reply 1673-4. PubMed ID: 16863578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.