193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17056450)
1. The intrauterine device in modern contraception: Still an actuality?
Tinelli A; Tinelli R; Malvasi A; Cavallotti C; Tinelli FG
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2006 Sep; 11(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 17056450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device to the sigmoid colon: a case report.
Nceboz US; Ozçakir HT; Uyar Y; Cağlar H
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2003 Dec; 8(4):229-32. PubMed ID: 15006271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of a copper intra-uterine contraceptive device on the microbial ecology of the female genital tract.
Elhag KM; Bahar AM; Mubarak AA
J Med Microbiol; 1988 Apr; 25(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 3357191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transuterine migration as a complication of intrauterine contraceptive devices: six case reports.
Tunçay YA; Tunçay E; Güzin K; Oztürk D; Omurcan C; Yücel N
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2004 Sep; 9(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 15697109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pelvic actinomycosis and usage of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
Kelly J; Aaron J
Yale J Biol Med; 1982; 55(5-6):453-61. PubMed ID: 7183022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Extrauterine mislocated IUD].
Gardyszewska A; Niewiadomska-Kowalczyk M; Szymańska B; Roszkowski P; Czajkowski K
Ginekol Pol; 2009 Dec; 80(12):942-5. PubMed ID: 20120941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uterine perforation by a Copper 7 intrauterine contraceptive device with subsequent penetration of the appendix. Case report.
McWhinney NA; Jarrett R
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Aug; 90(8):774-6. PubMed ID: 6349675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acceptability of IUDs is increasing.
Finger WR; Barr D
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1992 Oct; 13(2):27-30. PubMed ID: 12286082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management of the missing intrauterine contraceptive device: report of a case.
Gorsline JC; Osborne NG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Sep; 153(2):228-9. PubMed ID: 3898848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Intrauterine contraceptive device in an appendix--a case report].
Kuś E; Swierczewski A; Pasiński J; Estemberg D; Brzozowska M; Kowalska-Koprek U; Berner-Trabska M; Karowicz-Bilińska A
Ginekol Pol; 2012 Feb; 83(2):132-5. PubMed ID: 22568359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic removal of an intraperitoneal translocated intrauterine contraceptive device.
Miranda L; Settembre A; Capasso P; Cuccurullo D; Pisaniello D; Corcione F
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2003 Jun; 8(2):122-5. PubMed ID: 12831609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Migration of intrauterine devices: radiologic findings and implications for patient care.
Boortz HE; Margolis DJ; Ragavendra N; Patel MK; Kadell BM
Radiographics; 2012; 32(2):335-52. PubMed ID: 22411936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of IUDs in developing countries: a comparative study.
Farr G; Burdan A
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1991 Sep; 12(2):6-8, 12. PubMed ID: 12284280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasonographic evaluation of uterine perforation by an intrauterine device.
Degesys GE; Panella JS; Moyle J; Rochester D
J Ultrasound Med; 1982; 1(9):375. PubMed ID: 6152961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Complications of contraception with the intrauterine coil].
Frantsov S; Novachkov L; Koleva Zh
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1985; 24(2):64-5. PubMed ID: 3893190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 3 of 4): Chapter 7--Intrauterine Contraception.
Black A; Guilbert E; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman W; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; Mansouri S
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Feb; 38(2):182-222. PubMed ID: 27032746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Use of hysterography as a rapid method for determining complications occurring in the presence of an intrauterine pessary].
Nalbanski B; Cherveniashki S; Nalbanski B
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1988; 27(2):58-61. PubMed ID: 3414902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Secondary cervical perforation by the Copper-T intrauterine device.
Ovadia J; Reichman J; Goldman JA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1979 Dec; 9(6):403-4. PubMed ID: 400870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
