These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17056964)
1. Craniocervical extension improves the specificity and predictive value of the Mallampati airway evaluation. Mashour GA; Sandberg WS Anesth Analg; 2006 Nov; 103(5):1256-9. PubMed ID: 17056964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The extended Mallampati score and a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus are predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in the morbidly obese. Mashour GA; Kheterpal S; Vanaharam V; Shanks A; Wang LY; Sandberg WS; Tremper KK Anesth Analg; 2008 Dec; 107(6):1919-23. PubMed ID: 19020139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparison of the Mallampati evaluation in neutral or extended cervical spine positions: a retrospective observational study of >80 000 patients. Healy DW; LaHart EJ; Peoples EE; Jewell ES; Bettendorf RJ; Ramachandran SK Br J Anaesth; 2016 May; 116(5):690-8. PubMed ID: 27106973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in obstetric patients scheduled for Caesarean delivery. Honarmand A; Safavi MR Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Sep; 25(9):714-20. PubMed ID: 18471331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Mouth opening in relation to the craniocervical position during induction of general anesthesia]. Hidaka S; Nakagawa I; Uesugi F; Kubo T; Hamaguchi K; Kato T Masui; 2005 Apr; 54(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 15852622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The diagnostic value of the upper lip bite test combined with sternomental distance, thyromental distance, and interincisor distance for prediction of easy laryngoscopy and intubation: a prospective study. Khan ZH; Mohammadi M; Rasouli MR; Farrokhnia F; Khan RH Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):822-4. PubMed ID: 19690252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic predictor of difficult laryngoscopy: the hyomental distance ratio. Huh J; Shin HY; Kim SH; Yoon TK; Kim DK Anesth Analg; 2009 Feb; 108(2):544-8. PubMed ID: 19151285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter-observer agreement of tests used for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy/tracheal intubation. Rosenstock C; Gillesberg I; Gätke MR; Levin D; Kristensen MS; Rasmussen LS Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Sep; 49(8):1057-62. PubMed ID: 16095443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of difficult intubation in patients with cervical spine limitations. Mashour GA; Stallmer ML; Kheterpal S; Shanks A J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2008 Apr; 20(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 18362772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevalence and prediction of difficult intubation in maxillofacial surgery patients. Tuzuner-Oncul AM; Kucukyavuz Z J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 66(8):1652-8. PubMed ID: 18634954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The palm print as a sensitive predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in diabetics: a comparison with other airway evaluation indices. Vani V; Kamath SK; Naik LD J Postgrad Med; 2000; 46(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 11013469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting difficult intubation--a comparison between Mallampati classification and Wilson risk-sum. Siddiqi R; Kazi WA J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):253-6. PubMed ID: 15907231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Difficult intubation: a prospective evaluation of the Mallampati and Wilson tests]. Laplace E; Bénéfice S; Marti Flich J; Patrigeon RG; Combourieu E Cah Anesthesiol; 1995; 43(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 7671089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The reliability and validity of the upper lip bite test compared with the Mallampati classification to predict difficult laryngoscopy: an external prospective evaluation. Eberhart LH; Arndt C; Cierpka T; Schwanekamp J; Wulf H; Putzke C Anesth Analg; 2005 Jul; 101(1):284-9, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15976247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting difficult laryngoscopy in acromegalic patients undergoing surgery for excision of pituitary tumors: A comparison of extended Mallampati score with modified Mallampati classification. Bindra A; Prabhakar H; Bithal PK; Singh GP; Chowdhury T J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2013 Apr; 29(2):187-90. PubMed ID: 23878439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation in Turkish patients: a multi-center methodological study. Yildiz TS; Korkmaz F; Solak M; Toker K; Erciyes N; Bayrak F; Ganidagli S; Tekin M; Kizilkaya M; Karsli B; Turan A; Ozcan U Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Dec; 24(12):1034-40. PubMed ID: 17555609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of preoperative airway assessment techniques: the modified Mallampati and the upper lip bite test. Hester CE; Dietrich SA; White SW; Secrest JA; Lindgren KR; Smith T AANA J; 2007 Jun; 75(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 17591297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of position and phonation on oropharyngeal view and correlation with laryngoscpic view. Amadasun FE; Adudu OP; Sadiq A Niger J Clin Pract; 2010 Dec; 13(4):417-20. PubMed ID: 21220857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of lighted stylet (Surch-Lite) and direct laryngoscopic intubation in patients with high Mallampati scores. Rhee KY; Lee JR; Kim J; Park S; Kwon WK; Han S Anesth Analg; 2009 Apr; 108(4):1215-9. PubMed ID: 19299790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preoperative airway assessment: predictive value of a multivariate risk index. el-Ganzouri AR; McCarthy RJ; Tuman KJ; Tanck EN; Ivankovich AD Anesth Analg; 1996 Jun; 82(6):1197-204. PubMed ID: 8638791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]