236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17058125)
1. The 2003 revised TNM staging system for breast cancer: results of stage re-classification on survival and future comparisons among stage groups.
Escobar PF; Patrick RJ; Rybicki LA; Weng DE; Crowe JP
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Jan; 14(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 17058125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic value of the 2002 TNM classification for breast carcinoma with regard to the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes.
Duraker N; Caynak ZC
Cancer; 2005 Aug; 104(4):700-7. PubMed ID: 16003773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Prognosis after complete surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer based on the staging classification].
Pfannschmidt J; Muley T; Hoffmann H; Bülzebruck H; Dienemann H
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2006 Nov; 131(47):2643-8. PubMed ID: 17109272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of stage-specific outcome of breast cancer based on 5th and 6th AJCC staging system.
Kim SI; Park BW; Lee KS
J Surg Oncol; 2006 Mar; 93(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 16482602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Prognostic assessment of the new UICC TNM classification for resected lung cancer].
Hayashi Y; Tomiyama I; Ishii H; Ishiwa N; Itoh H; Nakayama H; Ogawa N; Takanashi Y
Kyobu Geka; 2000 Oct; 53(11):919-25. PubMed ID: 11048442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in the 2003 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for breast cancer dramatically affect stage-specific survival.
Woodward WA; Strom EA; Tucker SL; McNeese MD; Perkins GH; Schechter NR; Singletary SE; Theriault RL; Hortobagyi GN; Hunt KK; Buchholz TA
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Sep; 21(17):3244-8. PubMed ID: 12947058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parotid cancer: Impact of changes from the 1997 to the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer classification on outcome prediction.
Schroeder U; Groppe D; Mueller RP; Guntinas-Lichius O
Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(4):758-64. PubMed ID: 18613074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimates of stage-specific survival are altered by changes in the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for melanoma.
Ben-Porat L; Panageas KS; Hanlon C; Patel A; Halpern A; Houghton AN; Coit D
Cancer; 2006 Jan; 106(1):163-71. PubMed ID: 16331596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Chinese classification system compared with TNM staging in prognosis of patients with primary hepatic carcinoma after resection.
Sheng JM; Zhao WH; Wu FS; Ma ZM; Feng YZ; Zhou XR; Teng LS
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2005 Nov; 4(4):561-4. PubMed ID: 16286262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Need for a revised staging consensus in medullary thyroid carcinoma.
Boostrom SY; Grant CS; Thompson GB; Farley DR; Richards ML; Hoskin TL; Hay ID
Arch Surg; 2009 Jul; 144(7):663-9. PubMed ID: 19620547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Lung cancer: new staging system and prognosis].
Li C; Zhang R
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Mar; 38(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 11832024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term survival of patients with supraclavicular metastases at diagnosis of breast cancer.
Olivotto IA; Chua B; Allan SJ; Speers CH; Chia S; Ragaz J
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Mar; 21(5):851-4. PubMed ID: 12610184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature.
Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Rossi S; Bellagamba R; Cicchini C; Nigri G; Ercolani G; De Angelis R; Ramacciato G
Am Surg; 2007 Apr; 73(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 17439029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Survival in cancer of the breast in Zaragoza (1960-1990) in relation to age, clinical stage and period of time of the diagnosis].
Navarro García JF; Vioque J; Cuchí Alfaro C; Crespo Villarroya B; de las Heras EM; Millas Ros J; Bolumar Montrull F; Arribas Llorente JL; Gómez López LI
Med Clin (Barc); 1995 Dec; 105(19):721-7. PubMed ID: 8523952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Restaging of differentiated thyroid carcinoma by the sixth edition AJCC/UICC TNM staging system: stage migration and predictability.
Lang B; Lo CY; Chan WF; Lam KY; Wan KY
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 14(5):1551-9. PubMed ID: 17318278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dukes' classification as a prognostic factor in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus undergoing combined-modality treatment.
Dabrowski A; Skoczylas T; Ciechański A; Wallner G; Zinkiewicz K; Cwik G; Górczyński R; Borowski A
Med Sci Monit; 2006 Oct; 12(10):CR409-15. PubMed ID: 17006399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the new TNM staging system proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer at a single institution.
Kameyama K; Takahashi M; Ohata K; Igai H; Yamashina A; Matsuoka T; Nakagawa T; Okumura N
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1180-4. PubMed ID: 19379988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-small cell lung cancer with ipsilateral pulmonary metastases: prognosis analysis and staging assessment.
Lee JG; Lee CY; Kim DJ; Chung KY; Park IK
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Mar; 33(3):480-4. PubMed ID: 18249000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How should the TNM staging system for lung cancer be revised? A simulation based on the Japanese Lung Cancer Registry populations.
Asamura H; Goya T; Koshiishi Y; Sohara Y; Tsuchiya R; Miyaoka E;
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):316-9. PubMed ID: 16872956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of clinical outcome in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using TNM classification score and molecular biological classification.
Takeno S; Noguchi T; Takahashi Y; Fumoto S; Shibata T; Kawahara K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1431-8. PubMed ID: 17260107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
