316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17058242)
1. Beyond randomized controlled trials: a critical comparison of trials with nonrandomized studies.
Sørensen HT; Lash TL; Rothman KJ
Hepatology; 2006 Nov; 44(5):1075-82. PubMed ID: 17058242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From randomized controlled trials to observational studies.
Silverman SL
Am J Med; 2009 Feb; 122(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 19185083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Study designs for the evaluation of drug effects].
Christensen S; Christiansen CF; Sørensen HT
Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Mar; 171(10):799-802. PubMed ID: 19265605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
Shahar E; Shahar DJ
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Observational studies: going beyond the boundaries of randomized controlled trials.
Yang W; Zilov A; Soewondo P; Bech OM; Sekkal F; Home PD
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2010 May; 88 Suppl 1():S3-9. PubMed ID: 20466165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. RCTs and observational studies to determine the effect of prophylaxis in severe haemophilia.
Fischer K; Grobbee DE; van den Berg HM
Haemophilia; 2007 Jul; 13(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 17610546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complementarity comes of age.
Black N
Transplantation; 2008 Jul; 86(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 18622273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Observational studies: a review of study designs, challenges and strategies to reduce confounding.
Lu CY
Int J Clin Pract; 2009 May; 63(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 19392919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Controlled randomized clinical trials].
Jaillon P
Bull Acad Natl Med; 2007; 191(4-5):739-56; discussion 756-8. PubMed ID: 18225427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can observational studies replace or complement experiment?
van der Linden S; Goldsmith CH; Woodcock J; Nassonova V
J Rheumatol Suppl; 1994 Sep; 41():57-61. PubMed ID: 7799388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Some observations on observational research.
Bluhm R
Perspect Biol Med; 2009; 52(2):252-63. PubMed ID: 19395823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Creating and synthesizing evidence with decision makers in mind: integrating evidence from clinical trials and other study designs.
Atkins D
Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S16-22. PubMed ID: 17909376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Study design for the evaluation of treatment.
Morales AJ
Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 8796933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized and observational studies in nephrology: how strong is the evidence?
Greene T
Am J Kidney Dis; 2009 Mar; 53(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 19185399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk factors, confounding, and the illusion of statistical control.
Christenfeld NJ; Sloan RP; Carroll D; Greenland S
Psychosom Med; 2004; 66(6):868-75. PubMed ID: 15564351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The intention-to-treat approach in randomized controlled trials: are authors saying what they do and doing what they say?
Gravel J; Opatrny L; Shapiro S
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 17848496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
