These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17058334)
21. The regulation of in-vitro fertilisation: social norms and discrimination. Porter D E Law; 1997 Sep; 4(3):E4. PubMed ID: 16900613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Assisted reproduction for couples affected by human immunodeficiency virus in California. Barnhart N; Shannon M; Weber S; Cohan D Fertil Steril; 2009 Apr; 91(4 Suppl):1540-3. PubMed ID: 18973880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reproductive technology and the rights of disabled persons. Tait JJ Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):446-55. PubMed ID: 11651099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Commentary on Canadian proposals. Morgan D Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Sep; (81):13-5. PubMed ID: 15997537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Private religious hospitals: limitations upon autonomous moral choices in reproductive medicine. Bassett WW J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 17(2):455-583. PubMed ID: 11475568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Access to fertility treatment by gays, lesbians, and unmarried persons. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Fertil Steril; 2009 Oct; 92(4):1190-1193. PubMed ID: 19732884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Access to fertility services by transgender persons: an Ethics Committee opinion. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Fertil Steril; 2015 Nov; 104(5):1111-5. PubMed ID: 26363388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Does every infertile patient have a guaranteed right to treatment? Cobb TG JAAPA; 2010 Jun; 23(6):36, 38-40. PubMed ID: 20653259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Belgian law on medically assisted reproduction and the disposition of supernumerary embryos and gametes. Pennings G Eur J Health Law; 2007 Nov; 14(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 18229762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The Human Rights Act 1998 and reproductive rights. Millns S Parliam Aff; 2001 Jul; 54(3):475-94. PubMed ID: 12449934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Held to a higher standard. Nelson HL Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(3):2-3. PubMed ID: 11642896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Refusal in "Bartleby, the Scrivener": narrative ethics and conscientious objection. Ikoku AA Virtual Mentor; 2013 Mar; 15(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 23472817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Providing reproductive care to HIV-1 serodiscordant couples: final thoughts. Sauer MV Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(2):W2. PubMed ID: 14635631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Gatekeeping and assisted reproductive technology. The ethical rights and responsibilities of doctors. Pearn JH Med J Aust; 1997 Sep; 167(6):318-20. PubMed ID: 9322778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 14: equity of access to assisted reproductive technology. ; Pennings G; de Wert G; Shenfield F; Cohen J; Tarlatzis B; Devroey P Hum Reprod; 2008 Apr; 23(4):772-4. PubMed ID: 18321893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Your ART ticket is no longer valid after how many attempts?]. Antoine JM J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2005 Nov; 34(7 Pt 2):5S42-5S44. PubMed ID: 16340905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Access to infertility investigations and treatment in couples infected with HIV: questionnaire survey. Apoola A; tenHof J; Allan PS BMJ; 2001 Dec; 323(7324):1285. PubMed ID: 11731391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]