112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17059719)
1. Centralisation of oesophagogastric cancer services: can specialist units deliver?
Forshaw MJ; Gossage JA; Stephens J; Strauss D; Botha AJ; Atkinson S; Mason RC
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2006 Oct; 88(6):566-70. PubMed ID: 17059719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Goshima KR; Mills JL; Awari K; Pike SL; Hughes JD
Ann Vasc Surg; 2008; 22(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 18411029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The implementation of minimally-invasive esophagectomy does not impact short-term outcome in a high-volume center.
Schwameis K; Ba-Ssalamah A; Wrba F; Birner P; Prager G; Hejna M; Schmid R; Asari R; Zacherl J; Schoppmann SF
Anticancer Res; 2013 May; 33(5):2085-91. PubMed ID: 23645759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk adjustment models for short-term outcomes after surgical resection for oesophagogastric cancer.
Fischer C; Lingsma H; Hardwick R; Cromwell DA; Steyerberg E; Groene O
Br J Surg; 2016 Jan; 103(1):105-16. PubMed ID: 26607783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of intensive care unit admissions after elective cancer surgery.
Bos MM; Bakhshi-Raiez F; Dekker JW; de Keizer NF; de Jonge E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 39(6):584-92. PubMed ID: 23490335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in volume, clinical practice and outcome after reorganisation of oesophago-gastric cancer care in England: A longitudinal observational study.
Varagunam M; Hardwick R; Riley S; Chadwick G; Cromwell DA; Groene O
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 44(4):524-531. PubMed ID: 29433991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The 30-day versus in-hospital and 90-day mortality after esophagectomy as indicators for quality of care.
Talsma AK; Lingsma HF; Steyerberg EW; Wijnhoven BP; Van Lanschot JJ
Ann Surg; 2014 Aug; 260(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 25350650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hospital volume, proportion resected and mortality from oesophageal and gastric cancer: a population-based study in England, 2004-2008.
Coupland VH; Lagergren J; Lüchtenborg M; Jack RH; Allum W; Holmberg L; Hanna GB; Pearce N; Møller H
Gut; 2013 Jul; 62(7):961-6. PubMed ID: 23086798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of P-POSSUM and O-POSSUM in predicting mortality after oesophagogastric resections.
Nagabhushan JS; Srinath S; Weir F; Angerson WJ; Sugden BA; Morran CG
Postgrad Med J; 2007 May; 83(979):355-8. PubMed ID: 17488869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Failure to rescue patients after reintervention in gastroesophageal cancer surgery in England.
Almoudaris AM; Mamidanna R; Bottle A; Aylin P; Vincent C; Faiz O; Hanna GB
JAMA Surg; 2013 Mar; 148(3):272-6. PubMed ID: 23553312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of postoperative morbidity on long-term survival after oesophagectomy.
Hii MW; Smithers BM; Gotley DC; Thomas JM; Thomson I; Martin I; Barbour AP
Br J Surg; 2013 Jan; 100(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 23148025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physiology, not chronology, dictates outcomes after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: outcomes in patients 80 years and older.
Markar SR; Low DE
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):1020-6. PubMed ID: 23117475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Surgical outcomes of esophageal cancer resection since the development of an Oesophagogastric Tumour Board].
Farran Teixidor L; Llop Talaverón J; Galán Guzmán M; Aranda Danso H; Miró Martín M; Bettónica Larrañaga C; Estremiana García F; Biondo S
Cir Esp; 2013 Oct; 91(8):517-23. PubMed ID: 23583091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.
Iversen LH
Dan Med J; 2012 Apr; 59(4):B4428. PubMed ID: 22459726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Avital S; Zundel N; Szomstein S; Rosenthal R
Am J Surg; 2005 Jul; 190(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 15972176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations.
Nguyen NT; Hinojosa MW; Smith BR; Chang KJ; Gray J; Hoyt D
Ann Surg; 2008 Dec; 248(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 19092354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position--experience of 130 patients.
Palanivelu C; Prakash A; Senthilkumar R; Senthilnathan P; Parthasarathi R; Rajan PS; Venkatachlam S
J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Jul; 203(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 16798482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome of oesophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction.
Zhang X; Watson DI; Jamieson GG; Lally C; Bessell JR; Devitt PG
ANZ J Surg; 2005 Jul; 75(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 15972033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving outcomes after gastroesophageal cancer resection: can Japanese results be reproduced in Western centers?
Hanna GB; Boshier PR; Knaggs A; Goldin R; Sasako M
Arch Surg; 2012 Aug; 147(8):738-45. PubMed ID: 22911070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical presentation and waiting time targets do not affect prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Raptis DA; Fessas C; Belasyse-Smith P; Kurzawinski TR
Surgeon; 2010 Oct; 8(5):239-46. PubMed ID: 20709279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
