BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

547 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17060208)

  • 1. Comparing an experimental agent to a standard agent: relative merits of a one-arm or randomized two-arm Phase II design.
    Taylor JM; Braun TM; Li Z
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(4):335-48. PubMed ID: 17060208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative evaluation of single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Pond GR; Abbasi S
    Clin Trials; 2011 Jun; 8(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 21511687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the design of phase II trials of cytostatic anticancer agents.
    Stone A; Wheeler C; Barge A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 16843736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practical Bayesian guidelines for phase IIB clinical trials.
    Thall PF; Simon R
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):337-49. PubMed ID: 7980801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multi-arm clinical trials of new agents: some design considerations.
    Freidlin B; Korn EL; Gray R; Martin A
    Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Jul; 14(14):4368-71. PubMed ID: 18628449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal designs for two-arm, phase II clinical trial design with multiple constraints.
    Mayo MS; Mahnken JD; Soong SJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jan; 20(1):106-24. PubMed ID: 20077252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A parallel phase I/II clinical trial design for combination therapies.
    Huang X; Biswas S; Oki Y; Issa JP; Berry DA
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 17688495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal and minimax three-stage designs for phase II oncology clinical trials.
    Chen K; Shan M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jan; 29(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17544337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review of phase II trial designs used in studies of molecular targeted agents: outcomes and predictors of success in phase III.
    El-Maraghi RH; Eisenhauer EA
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Mar; 26(8):1346-54. PubMed ID: 18285606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early selection in a randomized phase II clinical trial.
    Steinberg SM; Venzon DJ
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(12):1711-26. PubMed ID: 12111907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized phase II trials with a prospective control.
    Jung SH
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):568-83. PubMed ID: 17573688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementing a decision-theoretic design in clinical trials: why and how?
    Palmer CR; Shahumyan H
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4939-57. PubMed ID: 17582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Other paradigms: better treatments are identified by better trials: the value of randomized phase II studies.
    Sharma MR; Maitland ML; Ratain MJ
    Cancer J; 2009; 15(5):426-30. PubMed ID: 19826363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An efficient algorithm to determine the optimal two-stage randomized multinomial designs in oncology clinical trials.
    Zhang Y; Mietlowski W; Chen B; Wang Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 21191854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A three-outcome design for randomized comparative phase II clinical trials.
    Hong S; Wang Y
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3525-34. PubMed ID: 17262879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Seamless Phase II/III combination study through response adaptive randomization.
    Wang L; Cui L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1177-87. PubMed ID: 18027224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized phase II designs in cancer clinical trials: current status and future directions.
    Lee JJ; Feng L
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Jul; 23(19):4450-7. PubMed ID: 15994154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimising the design of phase II oncology trials: the importance of randomisation.
    Ratain MJ; Sargent DJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 45(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 19059773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On Simon's two-stage design for single-arm phase IIA cancer clinical trials under beta-binomial distribution.
    Liu J; Lin Y; Shih WJ
    Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(10):1084-95. PubMed ID: 20077506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An adjustment for patient heterogeneity in the design of two-stage phase II trials.
    Sposto R; Gaynon PS
    Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(20):2566-79. PubMed ID: 19521973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.