These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17060836)
1. Classical test theory. DeVellis RF Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S50-9. PubMed ID: 17060836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving measurement in health education and health behavior research using item response modeling: comparison with the classical test theory approach. Wilson M; Allen DD; Li JC Health Educ Res; 2006 Dec; 21 Suppl 1():i19-32. PubMed ID: 16880221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance. Meredith W; Teresi JA Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. PubMed ID: 17060838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the properties of a stage-specific self-efficacy scale for physical activity using classical test theory, confirmatory factor analysis and item response modeling. Mâsse LC; Heesch KC; Eason KE; Wilson M Health Educ Res; 2006 Dec; 21 Suppl 1():i33-46. PubMed ID: 17035352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education. De Champlain AF Med Educ; 2010 Jan; 44(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 20078762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Classical test theory and item response theory analyses of multi-item scales assessing parents' perceptions of their children's dental care. Hays RD; Brown J; Brown LU; Spritzer KL; Crall JJ Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S60-8. PubMed ID: 17060837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Integrating validity theory with use of measurement instruments in clinical settings. Kelly PA; O'Malley KJ; Kallen MA; Ford ME Health Serv Res; 2005 Oct; 40(5 Pt 2):1605-19. PubMed ID: 16178998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Linking classical test theory and two-level hierarchical linear models. Miyazaki Y; Skaggs G J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(4):344-56. PubMed ID: 19092229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overview of quantitative measurement methods. Equivalence, invariance, and differential item functioning in health applications. Teresi JA Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S39-49. PubMed ID: 17060834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Post-examination interpretation of objective test data: monitoring and improving the quality of high-stakes examinations: AMEE Guide No. 66. Tavakol M; Dennick R Med Teach; 2012; 34(3):e161-75. PubMed ID: 22364473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Gilles de la Tourette syndrome-quality of life scale (GTS-QOL): development and validation. Cavanna AE; Schrag A; Morley D; Orth M; Robertson MM; Joyce E; Critchley HD; Selai C Neurology; 2008 Oct; 71(18):1410-6. PubMed ID: 18955683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the psychometric validity of the domains of the PDSQ: an illustration of the bi-factor item response theory model. Gibbons RD; Rush AJ; Immekus JC J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Jan; 43(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 18554611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) construct applying the item response theory to a non-clinical sample of heroin users. Gonzalez-Saiz F; Lozano OM; Ballesta R; Silva T; Brugal MT; Bilbao I; Barrio G; Domingo-Salvany A; Bravo MJ; De la Fuente L; Del Proyecto Itinere G Subst Use Misuse; 2008; 43(7):919-35. PubMed ID: 18570025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of Health Belief Model Scale in diabetic patients. Kartal A; Ozsoy SA Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Nov; 44(8):1447-58. PubMed ID: 17655849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a psychometric scale to assess satisfaction with dental care among Sri Lankans. Perera IR; Usgodaarachchi US Community Dent Health; 2009 Sep; 26(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 19780355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measure for measure: new developments in measurement and item response theory. Streiner DL Can J Psychiatry; 2010 Mar; 55(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 20370969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Questioning the measurement precision of psychotherapy research. Doucette A; Wolf AW Psychother Res; 2009 Jul; 19(4-5):374-89. PubMed ID: 20183398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of varying the number of response alternatives in rating scales: experimental evidence from intra-individual effects. Maydeu-Olivares A; Kramp U; García-Forero C; Gallardo-Pujol D; Coffman D Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):295-308. PubMed ID: 19363170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Theoretical, psychometric, and pragmatic issues in pain measurement. Gélinas C; Loiselle CG; LeMay S; Ranger M; Bouchard E; McCormack D Pain Manag Nurs; 2008 Sep; 9(3):120-30. PubMed ID: 18706383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]