258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17060836)
1. Classical test theory.
DeVellis RF
Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S50-9. PubMed ID: 17060836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving measurement in health education and health behavior research using item response modeling: comparison with the classical test theory approach.
Wilson M; Allen DD; Li JC
Health Educ Res; 2006 Dec; 21 Suppl 1():i19-32. PubMed ID: 16880221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.
Meredith W; Teresi JA
Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. PubMed ID: 17060838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the properties of a stage-specific self-efficacy scale for physical activity using classical test theory, confirmatory factor analysis and item response modeling.
Mâsse LC; Heesch KC; Eason KE; Wilson M
Health Educ Res; 2006 Dec; 21 Suppl 1():i33-46. PubMed ID: 17035352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education.
De Champlain AF
Med Educ; 2010 Jan; 44(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 20078762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Classical test theory and item response theory analyses of multi-item scales assessing parents' perceptions of their children's dental care.
Hays RD; Brown J; Brown LU; Spritzer KL; Crall JJ
Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S60-8. PubMed ID: 17060837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Integrating validity theory with use of measurement instruments in clinical settings.
Kelly PA; O'Malley KJ; Kallen MA; Ford ME
Health Serv Res; 2005 Oct; 40(5 Pt 2):1605-19. PubMed ID: 16178998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Linking classical test theory and two-level hierarchical linear models.
Miyazaki Y; Skaggs G
J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(4):344-56. PubMed ID: 19092229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overview of quantitative measurement methods. Equivalence, invariance, and differential item functioning in health applications.
Teresi JA
Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S39-49. PubMed ID: 17060834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Composite rating scales.
Martinez-Martin P
J Neurol Sci; 2010 Feb; 289(1-2):7-11. PubMed ID: 19732911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Post-examination interpretation of objective test data: monitoring and improving the quality of high-stakes examinations: AMEE Guide No. 66.
Tavakol M; Dennick R
Med Teach; 2012; 34(3):e161-75. PubMed ID: 22364473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Gilles de la Tourette syndrome-quality of life scale (GTS-QOL): development and validation.
Cavanna AE; Schrag A; Morley D; Orth M; Robertson MM; Joyce E; Critchley HD; Selai C
Neurology; 2008 Oct; 71(18):1410-6. PubMed ID: 18955683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the psychometric validity of the domains of the PDSQ: an illustration of the bi-factor item response theory model.
Gibbons RD; Rush AJ; Immekus JC
J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Jan; 43(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 18554611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) construct applying the item response theory to a non-clinical sample of heroin users.
Gonzalez-Saiz F; Lozano OM; Ballesta R; Silva T; Brugal MT; Bilbao I; Barrio G; Domingo-Salvany A; Bravo MJ; De la Fuente L; Del Proyecto Itinere G
Subst Use Misuse; 2008; 43(7):919-35. PubMed ID: 18570025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of Health Belief Model Scale in diabetic patients.
Kartal A; Ozsoy SA
Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Nov; 44(8):1447-58. PubMed ID: 17655849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a psychometric scale to assess satisfaction with dental care among Sri Lankans.
Perera IR; Usgodaarachchi US
Community Dent Health; 2009 Sep; 26(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 19780355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measure for measure: new developments in measurement and item response theory.
Streiner DL
Can J Psychiatry; 2010 Mar; 55(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 20370969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Questioning the measurement precision of psychotherapy research.
Doucette A; Wolf AW
Psychother Res; 2009 Jul; 19(4-5):374-89. PubMed ID: 20183398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of varying the number of response alternatives in rating scales: experimental evidence from intra-individual effects.
Maydeu-Olivares A; Kramp U; García-Forero C; Gallardo-Pujol D; Coffman D
Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):295-308. PubMed ID: 19363170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Theoretical, psychometric, and pragmatic issues in pain measurement.
Gélinas C; Loiselle CG; LeMay S; Ranger M; Bouchard E; McCormack D
Pain Manag Nurs; 2008 Sep; 9(3):120-30. PubMed ID: 18706383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
