These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. An introduction to bioinformatics. Brzeski H Methods Mol Biol; 2002; 187():193-208. PubMed ID: 12013746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Gene expression trends and protein features effectively complement each other in gene function prediction. Wabnik K; Hvidsten TR; Kedzierska A; Van Leene J; De Jaeger G; Beemster GT; Komorowski J; Kuiper MT Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 25(3):322-30. PubMed ID: 19050035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current progress in computational metabolomics. Wishart DS Brief Bioinform; 2007 Sep; 8(5):279-93. PubMed ID: 17626065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrating 'omic' information: a bridge between genomics and systems biology. Ge H; Walhout AJ; Vidal M Trends Genet; 2003 Oct; 19(10):551-60. PubMed ID: 14550629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multivariate analysis approach to the integration of proteomic and gene expression data. Fagan A; Culhane AC; Higgins DG Proteomics; 2007 Jun; 7(13):2162-71. PubMed ID: 17549791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomics and proteomics in process development: opportunities and challenges. Gupta P; Lee KH Trends Biotechnol; 2007 Jul; 25(7):324-30. PubMed ID: 17475353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. FatiGO +: a functional profiling tool for genomic data. Integration of functional annotation, regulatory motifs and interaction data with microarray experiments. Al-Shahrour F; Minguez P; Tárraga J; Medina I; Alloza E; Montaner D; Dopazo J Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W91-6. PubMed ID: 17478504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computational prediction of cancer-gene function. Hu P; Bader G; Wigle DA; Emili A Nat Rev Cancer; 2007 Jan; 7(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 17167517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayesian methods in bioinformatics and computational systems biology. Wilkinson DJ Brief Bioinform; 2007 Mar; 8(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 17430978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How can ontologies help vector biology? Topalis P; Lawson D; Collins FH; Louis C Trends Parasitol; 2008 Jun; 24(6):249-52. PubMed ID: 18440275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. BlotBase: a northern blot database. Schlamp K; Weinmann A; Krupp M; Maass T; Galle P; Teufel A Gene; 2008 Dec; 427(1-2):47-50. PubMed ID: 18838116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional genomics databases on the web. Stoeckert CJ Cell Microbiol; 2005 Aug; 7(8):1053-9. PubMed ID: 16008573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integration of genomic and metabonomic data in systems biology--are we 'there' yet? Thomas CE; Ganji G Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2006 Jan; 9(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 16445121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Functional screening revisited in the postgenomic era. Tochitani S; Hayashizaki Y Mol Biosyst; 2007 Mar; 3(3):195-207. PubMed ID: 17308666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How to decide which are the most pertinent overly-represented features during gene set enrichment analysis. Barriot R; Sherman DJ; Dutour I BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 8():332. PubMed ID: 17848190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Target selection for structural genomics: an overview. Marsden RL; Orengo CA Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 426():3-25. PubMed ID: 18542854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The-more-the-better and the-less-the-better. Li W Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(18):2187-8. PubMed ID: 16957134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]