These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17061722)

  • 1. Optical quality measurements of hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses.
    Sakuraba T
    J Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 22(8):824-6. PubMed ID: 17061722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevention of posterior capsule opacification using different intraocular lenses (results of one-year clinical study).
    Zemaitiene R; Jasinskas V; Barzdziukas V; Auffarth GU
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2004; 40(8):721-30. PubMed ID: 15299988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative analysis of in vitro accelerated glistening formation in foldable hydrophobic intraocular lenses.
    Tandogan T; Auffarth GU; Choi CY; Son HS; Khoramnia R
    Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 41(9):3073-3080. PubMed ID: 34013467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AcrySof acrylic intraocular lens implantation in children: clinical indications of biocompatibility.
    Wilson ME; Elliott L; Johnson B; Peterseim MM; Rah S; Werner L; Pandey SK
    J AAPOS; 2001 Dec; 5(6):377-80. PubMed ID: 11753259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification with AcrySof SN60AT and AF-1 YA-60BB blue-blocking intraocular lenses.
    Hancox J; Spalton D; Cleary G; Boyce J; Nanavaty MA; Thyagarajan S; Marshall J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1489-94. PubMed ID: 18721708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biological compatibility of polymethyl methacrylate, hydrophilic acrylic and hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses.
    Barbour W; Saika S; Miyamoto T; Ohnishi Y
    Ophthalmic Res; 2005; 37(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 16037680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of the optical quality of intraocular lenses.
    Tognetto D; Sanguinetti G; Sirotti P; Cecchini P; Marcucci L; Ballone E; Ravalico G
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Aug; 45(8):2682-90. PubMed ID: 15277492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the biomechanical behavior of foldable intraocular lenses.
    Lane SS; Burgi P; Milios GS; Orchowski MW; Vaughan M; Schwarte E
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2397-402. PubMed ID: 15519095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of Decentration and Tilt on Spherical, Aberration Correcting, and Specific Aspherical Intraocular Lenses: An Optical Bench Analysis.
    Borkenstein AF; Borkenstein EM; Luedtke H; Schmid R
    Ophthalmic Res; 2022; 65(4):425-436. PubMed ID: 35144263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro optical quality of monofocal aspheric toric intraocular lenses: effect of cylindrical power.
    Ferrer-Blasco T; Domínguez-Vicent A; García-Lázaro S; Diez MA; Alfonso JF; Esteve-Taboada JJ
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 38(3):933-941. PubMed ID: 28444524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of clinical efficacy: Nd:YAG laser rates after implantation of AcrySof® SN60WF, Akreos® AO-MI60 and Hoya® YA-60BB.
    Bourdiol Ducasse AM; Guerzider V; Velasque L; Dominguez M; Lafuma A; Robert J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2013 Sep; 36(7):575-82. PubMed ID: 23618731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optical quality differences between three multifocal intraocular lenses: bifocal low add, bifocal moderate add, and trifocal.
    Madrid-Costa D; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Ferrer-Blasco T; García-Lázaro S; Montés-Micó R
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Nov; 29(11):749-54. PubMed ID: 24203806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of posterior capsule opacification with round and sharp edge intraocular lenses.
    Auffarth GU; Golescu A; Becker KA; Völcker HE
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Apr; 110(4):772-80. PubMed ID: 12689901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses in distance optical bench tests.
    Maxwell WA; Lane SS; Zhou F
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):166-71. PubMed ID: 19101440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Results of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses in uveitic eyes with cataract: comparison to a control group.
    Abela-Formanek C; Amon M; Schauersberger J; Kruger A; Nepp J; Schild G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Jul; 28(7):1141-52. PubMed ID: 12106722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Heparin Surface-Modified Poly(methylmethacrylate) and Foldable Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses in Cataract Patients with Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome and CMV-Retinitis].
    Krieglsteiner S; Gümbel HO; Kohnen T
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Jan; 221(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 14745677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraocular lens changes after short- and long-term exposure to intraocular silicone oil. An in vivo study.
    Khawly JA; Lambert RJ; Jaffe GJ
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Jul; 105(7):1227-33. PubMed ID: 9663226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of folding on the optical quality of soft acrylic intraocular lenses.
    Oshika T; Shiokawa Y
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1996; 22 Suppl 2():1360-4. PubMed ID: 9051530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optical Bench Analysis of 2 Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses.
    Borkenstein AF; Borkenstein EM; Luedtke H; Schmid R
    Biomed Hub; 2021; 6(3):77-85. PubMed ID: 34950668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retinal image quality after microincision intraocular lens implantation.
    Alió JL; Schimchak P; Montés-Micó R; Galal A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1557-60. PubMed ID: 16129291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.