These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17061923)

  • 1. A compression-based approach for coding sequences identification. I. Application to prokaryotic genomes.
    Menconi G; Marangoni R
    J Comput Biol; 2006 Oct; 13(8):1477-88. PubMed ID: 17061923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions.
    Besemer J; Lomsadze A; Borodovsky M
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2001 Jun; 29(12):2607-18. PubMed ID: 11410670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GeneLook: a novel ab initio gene identification system suitable for automated annotation of prokaryotic sequences.
    Nishi T; Ikemura T; Kanaya S
    Gene; 2005 Feb; 346():115-25. PubMed ID: 15716020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An integrative and applicable phylogenetic footprinting framework for cis-regulatory motifs identification in prokaryotic genomes.
    Liu B; Zhang H; Zhou C; Li G; Fennell A; Wang G; Kang Y; Liu Q; Ma Q
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17():578. PubMed ID: 27507169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Features for computational operon prediction in prokaryotes.
    Chuang LY; Chang HW; Tsai JH; Yang CH
    Brief Funct Genomics; 2012 Jul; 11(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 22753776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EasyGene--a prokaryotic gene finder that ranks ORFs by statistical significance.
    Larsen TS; Krogh A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2003 Jun; 4():21. PubMed ID: 12783628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel method for prokaryotic promoter prediction based on DNA stability.
    Kanhere A; Bansal M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 6():1. PubMed ID: 15631638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. REPARATION: ribosome profiling assisted (re-)annotation of bacterial genomes.
    Ndah E; Jonckheere V; Giess A; Valen E; Menschaert G; Van Damme P
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Nov; 45(20):e168. PubMed ID: 28977509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conservation of gene co-regulation between two prokaryotes: Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli.
    Okuda S; Kawashima S; Goto S; Kanehisa M
    Genome Inform; 2005; 16(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 16362913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Features of coding and noncoding sequences based on 3-tuple distributions.
    Fu Q; Qian MP; Chen LB; Zhu YX
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2005 Oct; 32(10):1018-26. PubMed ID: 16252696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative genomic method for computational identification of prokaryotic translation initiation sites.
    Walker M; Pavlovic V; Kasif S
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2002 Jul; 30(14):3181-91. PubMed ID: 12136100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re-annotation of genome microbial coding-sequences: finding new genes and inaccurately annotated genes.
    Bocs S; Danchin A; Médigue C
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2002; 3():5. PubMed ID: 11879526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CONSORF: a consensus prediction system for prokaryotic coding sequences.
    Kang S; Yang SJ; Kim S; Bhak J
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Nov; 23(22):3088-90. PubMed ID: 17977885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferring regulatory elements from a whole genome. An analysis of Helicobacter pylori sigma(80) family of promoter signals.
    Vanet A; Marsan L; Labigne A; Sagot MF
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Mar; 297(2):335-53. PubMed ID: 10715205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining diverse evidence for gene recognition in completely sequenced bacterial genomes.
    Frishman D; Mironov A; Mewes HW; Gelfand M
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1998 Jun; 26(12):2941-7. PubMed ID: 9611239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Missing genes in the annotation of prokaryotic genomes.
    Warren AS; Archuleta J; Feng WC; Setubal JC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Mar; 11():131. PubMed ID: 20230630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EuGene: An Automated Integrative Gene Finder for Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes.
    Sallet E; Gouzy J; Schiex T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1962():97-120. PubMed ID: 31020556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cytosine usage modulates the correlation between CDS length and CG content in prokaryotic genomes.
    Xia X; Wang H; Xie Z; Carullo M; Huang H; Hickey D
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Jul; 23(7):1450-4. PubMed ID: 16687416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eukaryotic and prokaryotic promoter prediction using hybrid approach.
    Lin H; Li QZ
    Theory Biosci; 2011 Jun; 130(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 21046474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Study of triplet periodicity differences inside and between genomes.
    Suvorova YM; Korotkov EV
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2015 Apr; 14(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 25719343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.