BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17062498)

  • 1. The effect of multi-channel wide dynamic range compression, noise reduction, and the directional microphone on horizontal localization performance in hearing aid wearers.
    Keidser G; Rohrseitz K; Dillon H; Hamacher V; Carter L; Rass U; Convery E
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):563-79. PubMed ID: 17062498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of frequency-dependent microphone directionality on horizontal localization performance in hearing-aid users.
    Keidser G; O'Brien A; Hain JU; McLelland M; Yeend I
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Nov; 48(11):789-803. PubMed ID: 19951147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of in-the-ear microphone directionality on sound direction identification.
    Chung K; Neuman AC; Higgins M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2264-75. PubMed ID: 18397031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part II--field tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 19773657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of performance on the hearing in noise test using directional microphones and digital noise reduction algorithms.
    Nordrum S; Erler S; Garstecki D; Dhar S
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 16803795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ear asymmetries and asymmetric directional microphone hearing aid fittings.
    Cord MT; Surr RK; Walden BE; Dittberner AB
    Am J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 20(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 21764997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant.
    Dunn CC; Tyler RS; Witt SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):668-80. PubMed ID: 16197280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of low-frequency gain and venting effects on the benefit derived from directionality and noise reduction in hearing aids.
    Keidser G; Carter L; Chalupper J; Dillon H
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Oct; 46(10):554-68. PubMed ID: 17922345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a pinna compensation algorithm for sound localization and speech perception in noise.
    Kuk F; Korhonen P; Lau C; Keenan D; Norgaard M
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 23275583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Left-right and front-back spatial hearing with multiple directional microphone configurations in modern hearing aids.
    Carette E; Van den Bogaert T; Laureyns M; Wouters J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):791-803. PubMed ID: 25405835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.
    Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Bebear JP; Godey B; Robier A; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Bordure P; Mondain M; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 18832816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of an adaptive directional system in a DSP hearing aid.
    Bentler RA; Tubbs JL; Egge JL; Flamme GA; Dittberner AB
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 15248806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unaided and aided performance with a directional open-fit hearing aid.
    Valente M; Mispagel KM
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):329-36. PubMed ID: 18569105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.