These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17063009)

  • 1. Temporal bone results and hearing preservation with a new straight electrode.
    Lenarz T; Stover T; Buechner A; Paasche G; Briggs R; Risi F; Pesch J; Battmer RD
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():34-41. PubMed ID: 17063009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new cochlear implant electrode design for preservation of residual hearing: a temporal bone study.
    Skarzynski H; Podskarbi-Fayette R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Apr; 130(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 19883172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear implantation and hearing preservation: Results in 21 consecutively operated patients using the round window approach.
    Erixon E; Köbler S; Rask-Andersen H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 132(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 22667762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ipsilateral electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of long-term hearing preservation.
    Gstoettner WK; Helbig S; Maier N; Kiefer J; Radeloff A; Adunka OF
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():49-56. PubMed ID: 17063011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode.
    Briggs RJ; Tykocinski M; Xu J; Risi F; Svehla M; Cowan R; Stover T; Erfurt P; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():42-8. PubMed ID: 17063010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hearing preservation via a cochleostomy approach and deep insertion of a standard length cochlear implant electrode.
    Bruce IA; Bates JE; Melling C; Mawman D; Green KM
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Dec; 32(9):1444-7. PubMed ID: 22089957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array.
    Helbig S; Van de Heyning P; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Gstoettner W
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 21281057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation.
    James CJ; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Lenarz T; Mawman D; Ramos A; Ramsden R; Sterkers O
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():57-62. PubMed ID: 17063012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear function following implantation with a full electrode array.
    Obholzer RJ; Gibson WP
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 21756458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing preservation outcomes with different cochlear implant electrodes: Nucleus® Hybrid™-L24 and Nucleus Freedom™ CI422.
    Jurawitz MC; Büchner A; Harpel T; Schüssler M; Majdani O; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(5):293-309. PubMed ID: 25277083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
    Vermeire K; Anderson I; Flynn M; Van de Heyning P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing preservation after cochlear reimplantation.
    Helbig S; Rajan GP; Stöver T; Lockley M; Kuthubutheen J; Green KM
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jan; 34(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 23202149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation.
    Adunka O; Kiefer J; Unkelbach MH; Lehnert T; Gstoettner W
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jul; 114(7):1237-41. PubMed ID: 15235353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preservation of cochlear structures and hearing when using the Nucleus Slim Straight (CI422) electrode in children.
    Skarzynski H; Matusiak M; Lorens A; Furmanek M; Pilka A; Skarzynski PH
    J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Apr; 130(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 26763105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing conservation surgery using the Hybrid-L electrode. Results from the first clinical trial at the Medical University of Hannover.
    Lenarz T; Stöver T; Buechner A; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Patrick J; Pesch J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():22-31. PubMed ID: 19390172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Partial deafness cochlear implantation provides benefit to a new population of individuals with hearing loss.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Anderson I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Sep; 126(9):934-40. PubMed ID: 16864490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
    Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation -- fact or fantasy?
    Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 May; 126(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 16698696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.