1491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17063274)
21. Role of breast MR imaging for predicting malignancy of histologically borderline lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: prospective evaluation.
Pediconi F; Padula S; Dominelli V; Luciani M; Telesca M; Casali V; Kirchin MA; Passariello R; Catalano C
Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 20884914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. MR Imaging for Diagnosis of Malignancy in Mammographic Microcalcifications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bennani-Baiti B; Baltzer PA
Radiology; 2017 Jun; 283(3):692-701. PubMed ID: 27788035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Scoring system based on BI-RADS lexicon to predict probability of malignancy in suspicious microcalcifications.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Kim JA; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Choi CH; Kim EK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1491-8. PubMed ID: 22173328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: radiological and pathological correlations.
Kettritz U; Morack G; Decker T
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 16036159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Detection of microcalcifications by high-resolution B-mode sonography in patients with BI-RADS 4a lesions].
Stöblen F; Landt S; Köninger A; Hecktor J; Kimmig R; Kümmel S
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2009; 49(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 20530944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Usefulness of MRI of microcalcification lesions to determine the indication for stereotactic mammotome biopsy.
Kikuchi M; Tanino H; Kosaka Y; Sengoku N; Yamashita K; Minatani N; Nishimiya H; Waraya M; Katoh H; Enomoto T; Kajita S; Woodhams R; Watanabe M
Anticancer Res; 2014 Nov; 34(11):6749-53. PubMed ID: 25368286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as B1-RADS 3].
Obenauer S; Fischer U; Baum F; Dammert S; Füzesi L; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2001 Aug; 173(8):696-701. PubMed ID: 11570238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Breast MRI as a Problem-solving Study in the Evaluation of BI-RADS Categories 3 and 4 Microcalcifications: Is it Worth Performing?
Shimauchi A; Machida Y; Maeda I; Fukuma E; Hoshi K; Tozaki M
Acad Radiol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):288-296. PubMed ID: 29191685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB).
Mendez A; Cabanillas F; Echenique M; Malekshamran K; Perez I; Ramos E
Ann Oncol; 2004 Mar; 15(3):450-4. PubMed ID: 14998847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characteristics, Malignancy Rate, and Follow-up of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Identified at Breast MR Imaging: Implications for MR Image Interpretation and Management.
Chikarmane SA; Birdwell RL; Poole PS; Sippo DA; Giess CS
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):707-15. PubMed ID: 27089027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Predictive values of BI-RADS(®) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
Badan GM; Piato S; Roveda D; de Faria Castro Fleury E
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 27666605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.
Kuhl CK; Schild HH; Morakkabati N
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):789-800. PubMed ID: 16118161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predictive value for malignancy of suspicious breast masses of BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 using ultrasound elastography and MR diffusion-weighted imaging.
Satake H; Nishio A; Ikeda M; Ishigaki S; Shimamoto K; Hirano M; Naganawa S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):202-9. PubMed ID: 21178068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy.
Burnside ES; Ochsner JE; Fowler KJ; Fine JP; Salkowski LR; Rubin DL; Sisney GA
Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):388-95. PubMed ID: 17255409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mammographic characteristics and vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) of non-palpable breast lesions.
Ventrella V; Tufaro A; Zito FA; Addante M; Stea B; Dentamaro R; D'Amico C; Paradiso A
Acta Radiol; 2011 Jul; 52(6):602-7. PubMed ID: 21565889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Adjunctive targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the work-up of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 and 4 lesions.
Zhang XL; Guan J; Li MZ; Liu MJ; Guo Y; Zheng YL; Yang Z; Yang JY
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Aug; 60(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 27162117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Nonmasslike enhancement at breast MR imaging: the added value of mammography and US for lesion categorization.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Trop I; Chopier J; David J; Lalonde L; Darai E; Rouzier R; Uzan S
Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 21771958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Sonographically-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy with digital mammography-guided skin marking of suspicious breast microcalcifications: comparison of outcomes with stereotactic biopsy in Asian women.
Hahn SY; Shin JH; Han BK; Ko EY
Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 21498322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
