These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17063908)

  • 1. Thinking about memories for everyday and shocking events: do people use ease-of-retrieval cues in memory judgments?
    Echterhoff G; Hirst W
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jun; 34(4):763-75. PubMed ID: 17063908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retrieving autobiographical memories influences judgments about others: the role of metacognitive experiences.
    Woltin KA; Corneille O; Yzerbyt VY
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Apr; 40(4):526-39. PubMed ID: 24458214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More than a feeling: Emotional cues impact the access and experience of autobiographical memories.
    Sheldon S; Donahue J
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):731-744. PubMed ID: 28244010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parallel effects of retrieval ease on attributions about the past and the future.
    Gregg J; Upadhyay SSN; Kuntzelman K; Sacchi E; Westerman DL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():96-104. PubMed ID: 30602131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subjective judgments on direct and generative retrieval of autobiographical memory: The role of interoceptive sensibility and emotion.
    Matsumoto N; Watson LA; Fujino M; Ito Y; Kobayashi M
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Nov; 50(8):1644-1663. PubMed ID: 35294741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Competitive retrieval strategy causes multimodal response distributions in multiple-cue judgments.
    Albrecht R; Hoffmann JA; Pleskac TJ; Rieskamp J; von Helversen B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1064-1090. PubMed ID: 31750721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of cue content on retrieval from autobiographical memory.
    Uzer T; Brown NR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():84-91. PubMed ID: 27940026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrieval effort cues predict eyewitness accuracy.
    Lindholm T; Jönsson FU; Liuzza MT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Dec; 24(4):534-542. PubMed ID: 30024208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A year's memories: the calendar effect in autobiographical recall.
    Kurbat MA; Shevell SK; Rips LJ
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):532-52. PubMed ID: 9610123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Memory shapes judgments: Tracing how memory biases judgments by inducing the retrieval of exemplars.
    Rosner A; von Helversen B
    Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():165-169. PubMed ID: 31100546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Specificity of autobiographical memories in depression: an analysis of retrieval processes in a think-aloud task.
    Barnhofer T; de Jong-Meyer R; Kleinpass A; Nikesch S
    Br J Clin Psychol; 2002 Nov; 41(Pt 4):411-6. PubMed ID: 12437795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of retrieval ease on health issue judgments: implications for campaign strategies.
    Chang C
    Health Commun; 2010 Dec; 25(8):670-80. PubMed ID: 21153983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tunnel memories for autobiographical events: central details are remembered more frequently from shocking than from happy experiences.
    Berntsen D
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Oct; 30(7):1010-20. PubMed ID: 12507366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Indirect cueing elicits distinct types of autobiographical event representations.
    Scoboria A; Talarico JM
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Dec; 22(4):1495-509. PubMed ID: 24185191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of retrieving childhood events on metamemory judgments depend on the questions you ask.
    Merckelbach H; Wiers R; Horselenberg R; Wessel I
    Br J Clin Psychol; 2001 Jun; 40(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11446243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When and why is ease of retrieval informative?
    Raghubir P; Menon G
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Jul; 33(5):821-32. PubMed ID: 16383170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the validity of remember-know judgments: evidence from think aloud protocols.
    McCabe DP; Geraci L; Boman JK; Sensenig AE; Rhodes MG
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1625-33. PubMed ID: 21963257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How do we remember public events? Pioneering a new area of everyday memory research.
    Abel M; Berntsen D
    Cognition; 2021 Sep; 214():104745. PubMed ID: 33951566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The enduring effect of availability.
    Corby KM; Homa D
    Am J Psychol; 2011; 124(2):189-202. PubMed ID: 21834404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cue generation and memory construction in direct and generative autobiographical memory retrieval.
    Harris CB; O'Connor AR; Sutton J
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 May; 33():204-16. PubMed ID: 25617861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.