These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17063908)

  • 21. Same as it ever was: vividness modulates the similarities and differences between the neural networks that support retrieving remote and recent autobiographical memories.
    Sheldon S; Levine B
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():880-91. PubMed ID: 23845428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Event memory: temporal-order judgments of personal life experiences.
    Fuhrman RW; Wyer RS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1988 Mar; 54(3):365-84. PubMed ID: 3361416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retrieving autobiographical memories: How different retrieval strategies associated with different cues explain reaction time differences.
    Uzer T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():144-50. PubMed ID: 26802518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Time passes too fast? Then recall the past! - Evidence for a reminiscence heuristic in passage of time judgments.
    Kosak F; Kuhbandner C; Hilbert S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():197-202. PubMed ID: 30660997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Response speeding mediates the contributions of cue familiarity and target retrievability to metamnemonic judgments.
    Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Oct; 12(5):874-9. PubMed ID: 16524004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does retrieval intentionality really matter? Similarities and differences between involuntary memories and directly and generatively retrieved voluntary memories.
    Barzykowski K; Staugaard SR
    Br J Psychol; 2016 Aug; 107(3):519-36. PubMed ID: 26514399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interference from mere thinking: mental rehearsal temporarily disrupts recall of motor memory.
    Yin C; Wei K
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Aug; 112(3):594-602. PubMed ID: 24805082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. What versus where: Investigating how autobiographical memory retrieval differs when accessed with thematic versus spatial information.
    Sheldon S; Chu S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1909-1921. PubMed ID: 27439143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Judgments of learning do not reduce to memory encoding operations: event-related potential evidence for distinct metacognitive processes.
    Skavhaug IM; Wilding EL; Donaldson DI
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1318():87-95. PubMed ID: 19968975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of mood and retrieval cues on semantic memory and metacognition.
    Hall ACG; Evans DG; Higginbotham L; Thompson KS
    Scand J Psychol; 2020 Jun; 61(3):333-347. PubMed ID: 32196673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Organisation and retrieval: the generation of event clusters.
    Odegard TN; Lampinen JM; Wirth-Beaumont ET
    Memory; 2004 Nov; 12(6):685-95. PubMed ID: 15724357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The use of cue familiarity during retrieval failure is affected by past versus future orientation.
    Cleary AM
    Memory; 2015; 23(4):590-601. PubMed ID: 24786966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
    Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
    Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retrieval of bilingual autobiographical memories: effects of cue language and cue imageability.
    Mortensen L; Berntsen D; Bohn OS
    Memory; 2015; 23(2):138-56. PubMed ID: 24443835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The nature of real, implanted, and fabricated memories for emotional childhood events: implications for the recovered memory debate.
    Porter S; Yuille JC; Lehman DR
    Law Hum Behav; 1999 Oct; 23(5):517-37. PubMed ID: 10487147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Things that go bump in your life: explaining the reminiscence bump in autobiographical memory.
    Jansari A; Parkin AJ
    Psychol Aging; 1996 Mar; 11(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 8726374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rumination and overgeneral autobiographical memory.
    Sutherland K; Bryant RA
    Behav Res Ther; 2007 Oct; 45(10):2407-16. PubMed ID: 17506978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Remembering the past and imagining the future: differences in event specificity of spontaneously generated thought.
    Anderson RJ; Dewhurst SA
    Memory; 2009 May; 17(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 19235018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Remember judgments and the constraint of direct experience.
    Stoettinger E; Kaiser W; Perner J
    Psychol Res; 2009 Sep; 73(5):623-32. PubMed ID: 18987880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Children's metamemorial judgments in an event recall task.
    Roebers CM; von der Linden N; Schneider W; Howie P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Jun; 97(2):117-37. PubMed ID: 17306823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.