These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17063914)

  • 1. Word frequency and word likeness mirror effects in episodic recognition memory.
    Heathcote A; Ditton E; Mitchell K
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jun; 34(4):826-38. PubMed ID: 17063914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perception and recognition memory of words and werds: two-way mirror effects.
    Becker DV; Goldinger SD; Stone GO
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Oct; 34(7):1495-511. PubMed ID: 17263074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interactions between study task, study time, and the low-frequency hit rate advantage in recognition memory.
    Criss AH; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):778-86. PubMed ID: 15238022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthographic neighborhood size effects in recognition memory.
    Glanc GA; Greene RL
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Mar; 35(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 17645177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times.
    Adelman JS; Brown GD; Quesada JF
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):814-23. PubMed ID: 16984300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of neighborhood size and exposure duration on visual-word recognition: evidence with the yes/no and the go/no-go lexical decision tasks.
    Perea M; Rosa E; Gómez C
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Feb; 65(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 12713243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.
    Duchek JM; Neely JH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):148-62. PubMed ID: 2927313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Type-based bigram frequencies for five-letter words.
    Novick LR; Sherman SJ
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Aug; 36(3):397-401. PubMed ID: 15641429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: cross-task comparisons.
    Carreiras M; Perea M; Grainger J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Jul; 23(4):857-71. PubMed ID: 9231433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decision-related factors in pupil old/new effects: Attention, response execution, and false memory.
    Brocher A; Graf T
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jul; 102():124-134. PubMed ID: 28624522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of orthographic neighborhood size effects in Chinese word recognition.
    Li MF; Lin WC; Chou TL; Yang FL; Wu JT
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2015 Jun; 44(3):219-36. PubMed ID: 25451553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aging and lexical inhibition: the effect of orthographic neighborhood frequency in young and older adults.
    Robert C; Mathey S
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2007 Nov; 62(6):P340-2. PubMed ID: 18079418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does "whole-word shape" play a role in visual word recognition?
    Perea M; Rosa E
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Jul; 64(5):785-94. PubMed ID: 12201337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory.
    Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ; Raoul A; Kaye M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 29683706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standard-Chinese Lexical Neighborhood Test in normal-hearing young children.
    Liu C; Liu S; Zhang N; Yang Y; Kong Y; Zhang L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 75(6):774-81. PubMed ID: 21458862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feature frequency effects in recognition memory.
    Malmberg KJ; Steyvers M; Stephens JD; Shiffrin RM
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jun; 30(4):607-13. PubMed ID: 12184562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual word recognition of single-syllable words.
    Balota DA; Cortese MJ; Sergent-Marshall SD; Spieler DH; Yap M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Jun; 133(2):283-316. PubMed ID: 15149254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do handwritten words magnify lexical effects in visual word recognition?
    Perea M; Gil-López C; Beléndez V; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(8):1631-47. PubMed ID: 26340587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task.
    Perea M; Rosa E; Gómez C
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Feb; 67(2):301-14. PubMed ID: 15971693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The development of the orthographic consistency effect in speech recognition: from sublexical to lexical involvement.
    Ventura P; Morais J; Kolinsky R
    Cognition; 2007 Dec; 105(3):547-76. PubMed ID: 17250820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.