BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

623 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17065028)

  • 21. The LOPSAQ study: 48 week analysis of a boosted double protease inhibitor regimen containing lopinavir/ritonavir plus saquinavir without additional antiretroviral therapy.
    Staszewski S; Babacan E; Stephan C; Haberl A; Carlebach A; Gute P; Klauke S; Hermschulte Y; Stuermer M; Dauer B;
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2006 Nov; 58(5):1024-30. PubMed ID: 16956902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of tipranavir boosted with ritonavir alone or in combination with other boosted protease inhibitors as part of optimized combination antiretroviral therapy in highly treatment-experienced patients (BI Study 1182.51).
    Walmsley SL; Katlama C; Lazzarin A; Arestéh K; Pierone G; Blick G; Johnson M; Meier U; MacGregor TR; Leith JG
    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2008 Apr; 47(4):429-40. PubMed ID: 18176328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical cross-resistance between the HIV-1 protease inhibitors saquinavir and indinavir and correlations with genotypic mutations.
    Schapiro JM; Winters MA; Lawrence J; Merigan TC
    AIDS; 1999 Feb; 13(3):359-65. PubMed ID: 10199226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tipranavir/Ritonavir (500/200 mg and 500/100 mg) Was Virologically Non-Inferior to Lopinavir/Ritonavir (400/100 mg) at Week 48 in Treatment-Naïve HIV-1-Infected Patients: A Randomized, Multinational, Multicenter Trial.
    Cooper DA; Cordery DV; Zajdenverg R; Ruxrungtham K; Arastéh K; Bergmann F; Neto JL; Scherer J; Chaves RL; Robinson P;
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0144917. PubMed ID: 26730818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Time to virological failure with atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir, with or without an H2-receptor blocker, not significantly different in HIV observational database study.
    Keiser PH; Nassar N
    Int J STD AIDS; 2008 Aug; 19(8):561-2. PubMed ID: 18663047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prevalence of the HIV-1 protease mutation I47A in clinical practice and association with lopinavir resistance.
    de Mendoza C; Valer L; Bacheler L; Pattery T; Corral A; Soriano V
    AIDS; 2006 Apr; 20(7):1071-4. PubMed ID: 16603864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Lopinavir/ritonavir vs. indinavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral naive HIV-infected patients: immunovirological outcome and side effects.
    Bongiovanni M; Bini T; Chiesa E; Cicconi P; Adorni F; Monforte d'Arminio A
    Antiviral Res; 2004 Apr; 62(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 15026202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical impact of double protease inhibitor boosting with lopinavir/ritonavir and amprenavir as part of salvage antiretroviral therapy.
    Loutfy M; Raboud J; Thompson C; Tseng A; Abdurrahman Z; Kovacs C; Rachlis A; Phillips E; Rubin G; Gough K; Walmsley S
    HIV Clin Trials; 2003; 4(5):301-10. PubMed ID: 14583846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Efficacy and safety of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir versus lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients at week 48.
    Ortiz R; Dejesus E; Khanlou H; Voronin E; van Lunzen J; Andrade-Villanueva J; Fourie J; De Meyer S; De Pauw M; Lefebvre E; Vangeneugden T; Spinosa-Guzman S
    AIDS; 2008 Jul; 22(12):1389-97. PubMed ID: 18614861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predictive factors for response to a boosted dual HIV-protease inhibitor therapy with saquinavir and lopinavir in extensively pre-treated patients.
    von Hentig N; Babacan E; Staszewski S; Stürmer M; Doerr HW; Lötsch J
    Antivir Ther; 2007; 12(8):1237-46. PubMed ID: 18240863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficacy, safety and predictive factors of virological success of a boosted amprenavir-based salvage regimen in heavily antiretroviral-experienced HIV-1-infected patients.
    Clevenbergh P; Boulmé R; Kirstetter M; Dellamonica P
    HIV Med; 2004 Jul; 5(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 15236618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic profile of a switch in antiretroviral therapy to saquinavir, ritonavir, and atazanavir alone for 48 weeks and a switch in the saquinavir formulation.
    Winston A; Mallon PW; Satchell C; MacRae K; Williams KM; Schutz M; Law M; Cooper DA; Emery S
    Clin Infect Dis; 2007 Jun; 44(11):1475-83. PubMed ID: 17479946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Darunavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection in adults.
    McKeage K; Perry CM; Keam SJ
    Drugs; 2009; 69(4):477-503. PubMed ID: 19323590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Long-term efficacy and safety of fosamprenavir plus ritonavir versus lopinavir/ritonavir in combination with abacavir/lamivudine over 144 weeks.
    Pulido F; Estrada V; Baril JG; Logue K; Schewe K; Plettenberg A; Duiculescu D; Yau L; Vavro C; Lim ML; Pharo C
    HIV Clin Trials; 2009; 10(2):76-87. PubMed ID: 19487177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Efficacy, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of the combination of stavudine, nevirapine, nelfinavir, and saquinavir as salvage regimen after ritonavir or indinavir failure.
    Casado JL; Dronda F; Hertogs K; Sabido R; Antela A; Martí-Belda P; Dehertogh P; Moreno S;
    AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses; 2001 Jan; 17(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 11177388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir versus twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 48 week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study.
    Molina JM; Andrade-Villanueva J; Echevarria J; Chetchotisakd P; Corral J; David N; Moyle G; Mancini M; Percival L; Yang R; Thiry A; McGrath D;
    Lancet; 2008 Aug; 372(9639):646-55. PubMed ID: 18722869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genotypic resistance analysis of the virological response to fosamprenavir-ritonavir in protease inhibitor-experienced patients in CONTEXT and TRIAD clinical trials.
    Marcelin AG; Flandre P; Molina JM; Katlama C; Yeni P; Raffi F; Antoun Z; Ait-Khaled M; Calvez V
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2008 Dec; 52(12):4251-7. PubMed ID: 18852278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of switching from lopinavir/ritonavir to boosted and un-boosted atazanavir on glucose metabolism: the ATAzanavir & GLUcose metabolism (ATAGLU) study.
    d'Ettorre G; Ceccarelli G; Zaccarelli M; Ascoli-Bartoli T; Bianchi L; Bellelli V; De Girolamo G; Serafino S; Giustini N; Mastroianni CM; Vullo V
    Int J STD AIDS; 2016 Jul; 27(8):638-43. PubMed ID: 26068963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relative antiviral efficacy of ritonavir-boosted darunavir and ritonavir-boosted tipranavir vs. control protease inhibitor in the POWER and RESIST trials.
    Hill A; Moyle G
    HIV Med; 2007 May; 8(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 17461854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Characterization of associations and development of atazanavir resistance after unplanned treatment interruptions.
    Tinago W; O'Halloran JA; O'Halloran RM; Macken A; Lambert JS; Sheehan GJ; Mallon PW
    HIV Med; 2014 Apr; 15(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 24215370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.