187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1706506)
1. Activity-sensing rate responsive versus conventional fixed-rate pacing: a comparison of rate behavior and patient well-being during routine daily exercise.
Candinas RA; Gloor HO; Amann FW; Schoenbeck M; Turina M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Feb; 14(2 Pt 1):204-13. PubMed ID: 1706506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes.
Sulke N; Chambers J; Dritsas A; Sowton E
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Mar; 17(3):696-706. PubMed ID: 1993790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dual sensor VVIR mode pacing: is it worth it?
Sulke N; Tan K; Kamalvand K; Bostock J; Bucknall C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 1):1560-7. PubMed ID: 8946451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of dual chamber and ventricular rate responsive pacing in patients over 75 with complete heart block.
Hargreaves MR; Channon KM; Cripps TR; Gardner M; Ormerod OJ
Br Heart J; 1995 Oct; 74(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 7488454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefit of single setting rate responsive ventricular pacing compared with fixed rate demand pacing in elderly patients.
Gammage M; Schofield S; Rankin I; Bennett M; Coles P; Pentecost B
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Feb; 14(2 Pt 1):174-80. PubMed ID: 1706502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is accurate rate response programming necessary?
Sulke N; Dritsas A; Chambers J; Sowton E
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Aug; 13(8):1031-44. PubMed ID: 1697950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing on ventilatory response to exercise in patients with complete AV block.
Tani M; Fujiki A; Asanoi H; Yoshida S; Tsuji H; Mizumaki K; Sasayama S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Oct; 15(10 Pt 1):1482-91. PubMed ID: 1383960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy and safety of ventricular rate responsive pacing in children with complete atrioventricular block.
Ragonese P; Guccione P; Drago F; Turchetta A; Calzolari A; Formigari R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Apr; 17(4 Pt 1):603-10. PubMed ID: 7516544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Superior cardiac hemodynamics of atrioventricular synchrony over rate responsive pacing at submaximal exercise: observations in activity sensing DDDR pacemakers.
Lau CP; Wong CK; Leung WH; Liu WX
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1832-7. PubMed ID: 1704550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Usefulness of transcutaneous triggering of conventional implanted pulse generators by an activity-sensing pacemaker for predicting effectiveness of rate response pacing.
Fetter J; Benditt DG; Mianulli M
Am J Cardiol; 1988 Nov; 62(13):901-5. PubMed ID: 3177238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-year experience with rate-modulated pacing controlled by mixed venous oxygen saturation.
Windecker S; Bubien RS; Halperin L; Moore A; Kay GN
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 21(7):1396-404. PubMed ID: 9670183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adequacy of pacing rate during exercise in rate responsive ventricular pacing.
Hasegawa A; Hatori M; Amano M; Iijima T; Adachi H; Yamaguchi E; Fukuda T; Murata K; Nagai R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 20(2 Pt 1):307-12. PubMed ID: 9058868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of ventricular function on the exercise hemodynamics of variable rate pacing.
Buckingham TA; Woodruff RC; Pennington DG; Redd RM; Janosik DL; Labovitz AJ; Graves R; Kennedy HL
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Jun; 11(6):1269-77. PubMed ID: 3367001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short-term and long-term changes of left ventricular volumes during rate-adaptive and single-rate pacing.
Sedney MI; Weijers E; van der Wall EE; Adipranoto JD; Camps J; Blokland JA; Pauwels EJ; Schipperheijn JJ; Buis B; Bruschke AV
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Dec; 12(12):1863-8. PubMed ID: 2481282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cardiac output is a sensitive indicator of difference in exercise performance between single and dual sensor pacemakers.
Leung SK; Lau CP; Tang MO
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 1):35-41. PubMed ID: 9474646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exercise hemodynamic benefits of rate adaptive ventricular pacing.
Ma J; Wang F; Zhang K; Yu P; Wang J; Chen X
Chin Med J (Engl); 1996 Jun; 109(6):459-62. PubMed ID: 9206079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Importance of AV synchronous pacing during low intensity exercise evaluated by oxygen kinetics.
Rickli H; Brunner-La Rocca HP; Maccarter DJ; Duru F; Candinas R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Feb; 23(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 10709225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life.
Lau CP; Tai YT; Leung WH; Wong CK; Lee P; Chung FL
Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Use of a rate responsive pacemaker in sick sinus syndrome].
Ito T; Nishino M; Nakagawa T; Okada T; Hasegawa S; Kuryu T; Ebisuno S; Ohnishi S; Tanahashi H; Yasuno M
Kokyu To Junkan; 1993 Jan; 41(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8434162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
