BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17065288)

  • 41. Radiation dose in digital chest radiography: comparison among three technologies.
    Saiani F; Ghirardi C; Rodella CA; Feroldi P; Chiesa A
    Radiol Med; 2004 Apr; 107(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 15103291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
    Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Phosphor plate computed radiography: response to variation in mAs at fixed kVp in an animal model. Potential role in neonatal imaging.
    Broderick NJ; Long B; Dreesen RG; Cohen MD; Cory DA; Katz BP; Kalasinski LA
    Clin Radiol; 1993 Jan; 47(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 8428416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Dose audit for patients undergoing two common radiography examinations with digital radiology systems.
    İnal T; Ataç G
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2014; 20(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 24317331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Survey of posteroanterior chest radiography in The Netherlands: patient dose and image quality.
    van Soldt RT; Zweers D; van den Berg L; Geleijns J; Jansen JT; Zoetelief J
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jun; 76(906):398-405. PubMed ID: 12814926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Do radiographers collimate? A retrospective analysis of radiographic collimation of common musculoskeletal examinations at an adult trauma centre.
    Ball S; McKerrow M; Murphy A
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2023 Mar; 70(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 36319191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Paediatric dose reduction with the introduction of digital fluorography.
    Mooney RB; McKinstry J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):117-20. PubMed ID: 11487817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Nationwide surveys of chest, abdomen, lumbosacral spine radiography, and upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy: a summary of findings.
    Spelic DC; Kaczmarek RV; Hilohi MC; Moyal AE
    Health Phys; 2010 Mar; 98(3):498-514. PubMed ID: 20147791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Digital radiography.
    Mattoon JS
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2006; 19(3):123-32. PubMed ID: 16971994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Digital radiography in urologic imaging: radiation dose reduction on urethrocystography.
    Zoeller G; May C; Vosshenrich R; Grabbe E; Schroeder-Printzen I; Weidner W; Ringert RH
    Urol Radiol; 1992; 14(1):56-8. PubMed ID: 1615575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Patient absorbed doses in digital grey-scale fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Taylor C
    Br J Radiol; 1986 Jul; 59(703):689-93. PubMed ID: 3730767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Radiation doses to patients undergoing scoliosis radiography.
    Chamberlain CC; Huda W; Hojnowski LS; Perkins A; Scaramuzzino A
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Aug; 73(872):847-53. PubMed ID: 11026860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Exposure reduction in cephalography with a digital photostimulable phosphor imaging system.
    Seki K; Okano T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):127-30. PubMed ID: 8299830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography for the detection of a skull fracture under varying exposure parameters.
    Langen HJ; Klein HM; Wein B; Schiwy-Bochat KH; Stargardt A; Günther RW
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Mar; 28(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 8486490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of digital radiography on emergency department radiographic examinations.
    Lee B; Junewick J; Luttenton C
    Emerg Radiol; 2006 May; 12(4):158-9. PubMed ID: 16601999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Radiation dose reduction in the evaluation of scoliosis: an application of digital radiography.
    Kushner DC; Cleveland RH; Herman TE; Zaleske DJ; Ehrlich MG; Correia JA
    Radiology; 1986 Oct; 161(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 3763863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of the Commission of the European Communities quality criteria for the paediatric lateral spine.
    Offiah AC; Hall CM
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Dec; 76(912):885-90. PubMed ID: 14711776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Implementation of a programme for reduction of radiographic doses and results achieved through increases in tube potential.
    Martin CJ; Darragh CL; McKenzie GA; Bayliss AP
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Mar; 66(783):228-33. PubMed ID: 8472116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Comparison of chest and abdominal x-ray radiation dose and its image quality-a multi-center study].
    Uto T; Ishiyama A; Kimura H; Katuragi Y; Masunari T; Shibutani T; Ishiki K; Nakanishi K; Anai T; Sumida S; Morimatu T; Miyano H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 21467733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. DOSIMETRY OF ADULT AND PEDIATRIC PATIENTS FOR COMMON DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY EXAMINATIONS.
    Rana BS; Kumar S; Sandhu IS; Singh NP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Jun; 179(4):349-357. PubMed ID: 29342278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.