These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17065288)

  • 61. Variation of Pediatric Doses Undergoing Digital and Computed Radiography Examination in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
    Teferi S; Zewdeneh D
    Ethiop J Health Sci; 2020 Mar; 30(2):269-276. PubMed ID: 32165817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Balance of required dose and image quality in digital radiography].
    Uffmann M; Schaefer-Prokop C; Neitzel U
    Radiologe; 2008 Mar; 48(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 18259724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The quality criteria concept: an introduction and overview.
    Jessen KA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):29-32. PubMed ID: 11487838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Contrast-detail-dose and dose efficiency analysis of a scanning digital and a screen-film-grid radiographic system.
    Cohen G; Wagner LK; Amtey SR; Di Bianca FA
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(3):358-67. PubMed ID: 7322059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Reduction in retake rates and radiation dosage through computed radiography.
    Polunin N; Lim TA; Tan KP
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1998 Nov; 27(6):805-7. PubMed ID: 10101554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [Digital radiography in neonatal intensive care].
    Merlo L; Bighi S; Cervi PM; Lupi L; Vita G
    Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):230-3. PubMed ID: 2236678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Does 100 mm photofluorography always have a dose advantage over conventional film-screen radiography in barium meals?
    Dzik-Jurasz AS; Mumcuoglu EA
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Feb; 70():168-71. PubMed ID: 9135443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Improving Radiation Protection in Digital Radiography.
    Moore QT
    Radiol Technol; 2016 Sep; 88(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 27601688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Patient dose evaluation by means of DICOM images for a direct radiography system.
    Rampado O; Garelli E; Zatteri R; Escoffier U; De Lucchi R; Ropolo R
    Radiol Med; 2008 Dec; 113(8):1219-28. PubMed ID: 18956145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Radiation doses from common radiographic procedures: a ten year perspective.
    Heggie JC; Wilkinson LE
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2000 Dec; 23(4):124-34. PubMed ID: 11376537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Slot-scan digital radiography of the lower extremities: a comparison to computed radiography with respect to image quality and radiation dose.
    Lee KH; Kwon JW; Yoon YC; Choi SH; Jung JY; Kim JH; Lee SJ
    Korean J Radiol; 2009; 10(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 19182503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Optimisation of patient protection and image quality in diagnostic radiology.
    Korir GK; Wambani JS; Ochieng BO
    East Afr Med J; 2010 Mar; 87(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 23057309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Problems associated with digital luminescence radiography in the neonate and young infant. Problems with digital radiography.
    Arthur RJ; Pease JN
    Pediatr Radiol; 1992; 22(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 1594310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Differences of X-ray exposure between roentgen examen with a conventional roentgen-screen-system and with an image intensifer-television-unit (author's transl)].
    Löhr H; Vogel H; Reinhart J; Jantzen R
    Rofo; 1977 May; 126(5):482-8. PubMed ID: 142054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Suspected infant abuse: radiographic skeletal survey practices in pediatric health care facilities.
    Kleinman PL; Kleinman PK; Savageau JA
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):477-85. PubMed ID: 15375226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Optimization of the radiological protection of patients undergoing digital radiography.
    Zhang M; Chu C
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Feb; 25(1):196-200. PubMed ID: 21725621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Impact of Lodox Statscan on radiation dose and screening time in paediatric trauma patients.
    Evangelopoulos DS; von Tobel M; Cholewa D; Wolf R; Exadaktylos AK; Zachariou Z
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2010 Nov; 20(6):382-6. PubMed ID: 21181605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Evaluation of exposure parameters in plain radiography: a comparative study with European guidelines.
    Lança L; Silva A; Alves E; Serranheira F; Correia M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):316-20. PubMed ID: 18430717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. New computed radiography using scanning laser stimulated luminescence.
    Kato H; Miyahara J; Takano M
    Neurosurg Rev; 1985; 8(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 3895040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. [Investigation of patient exposure doses in diagnostic radiography in 2011 questionnaire].
    Asada Y; Suzuki S; Kobayashi K; Kato H; Igarashi T; Tsukamoto A; Sakamoto H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Apr; 69(4):371-9. PubMed ID: 23609858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.