433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17065418)
41. High-resolution analysis of DNA copy number alterations and gene expression in renal clear cell carcinoma.
Yoshimoto T; Matsuura K; Karnan S; Tagawa H; Nakada C; Tanigawa M; Tsukamoto Y; Uchida T; Kashima K; Akizuki S; Takeuchi I; Sato F; Mimata H; Seto M; Moriyama M
J Pathol; 2007 Dec; 213(4):392-401. PubMed ID: 17922474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Full complexity genomic hybridization on 60-mer oligonucleotide microarrays for array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH).
Protopopov A; Feng B; Chin L
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 439():87-100. PubMed ID: 18370097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Genomic profiling of myeloid sarcoma by array comparative genomic hybridization.
Deeb G; Baer MR; Gaile DP; Sait SN; Barcos M; Wetzler M; Conroy JM; Nowak NJ; Cowell JK; Cheney RT
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2005 Dec; 44(4):373-83. PubMed ID: 16080198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Gene expression profiling and gene copy-number changes in malignant mesothelioma cell lines.
Zanazzi C; Hersmus R; Veltman IM; Gillis AJ; van Drunen E; Beverloo HB; Hegmans JP; Verweij M; Lambrecht BN; Oosterhuis JW; Looijenga LH
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2007 Oct; 46(10):895-908. PubMed ID: 17620293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparative genomic hybridization.
Pinkel D; Albertson DG
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2005; 6():331-54. PubMed ID: 16124865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [New technologies for the human genome exploration].
Keren B; Schluth-Bolard C; Egea G; Sanlaville D
Arch Pediatr; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1605-8. PubMed ID: 20843672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A method for calling gains and losses in array CGH data.
Wang P; Kim Y; Pollack J; Narasimhan B; Tibshirani R
Biostatistics; 2005 Jan; 6(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 15618527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Clinical utilization of high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism based oligonucleotide arrays in diagnostic studies of pediatric patients with solid tumors.
Dougherty MJ; Tooke LS; Sullivan LM; Hakonarson H; Wainwright LM; Biegel JA
Cancer Genet; 2012; 205(1-2):42-54. PubMed ID: 22429597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Diagnosis of fetal submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities in failed array CGH samples: copy number by sequencing as an alternative to microarrays for invasive fetal testing.
Cohen K; Tzika A; Wood H; Berri S; Roberts P; Mason G; Sheridan E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 25510919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of the efficacy of constitutional array-based comparative genomic hybridization in the diagnosis of aneuploidy using genomic and amplified DNA.
Tan NH; Palmer R; Wang R
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Feb; 36(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 20178523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparative genomic hybridization using oligonucleotide microarrays and total genomic DNA.
Barrett MT; Scheffer A; Ben-Dor A; Sampas N; Lipson D; Kincaid R; Tsang P; Curry B; Baird K; Meltzer PS; Yakhini Z; Bruhn L; Laderman S
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Dec; 101(51):17765-70. PubMed ID: 15591353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Rearrangements of chromosome 18 illustrate the utility of array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Kashork CD; Theisen A; Bejjani BA; Shaffer LG
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2006; 114(3-4):379-83. PubMed ID: 16954681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Use of targeted array-based CGH for the clinical diagnosis of chromosomal imbalance: is less more?
Bejjani BA; Saleki R; Ballif BC; Rorem EA; Sundin K; Theisen A; Kashork CD; Shaffer LG
Am J Med Genet A; 2005 Apr; 134(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 15723295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) as a useful tool for identifying genes involved in Glioblastoma (GB).
Ruano Y; Mollejo M; de Lope AR; Hernández-Moneo JL; Martínez P; Meléndez B
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 653():35-45. PubMed ID: 20721736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Detection of DNA copy-number alterations in complex genomes using array comparative genomic hybridization.
Cai WW
Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 381():105-19. PubMed ID: 17984516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Utility of array comparative genomic hybridization in cytogenetic analysis.
Singh RR; Cheung KJ; Horsman DE
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 730():219-34. PubMed ID: 21431645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Genomic microarrays in the spotlight.
Mantripragada KK; Buckley PG; de Ståhl TD; Dumanski JP
Drug Discov Today; 2004 Dec; 9(24 Suppl):S45-52. PubMed ID: 23573660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Current status and future prospects of array-based comparative genomic hybridisation.
Snijders AM; Pinkel D; Albertson DG
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic; 2003 Apr; 2(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 15239942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Characterization of breast cancer by array comparative genomic hybridization.
Climent J; Garcia JL; Mao JH; Arsuaga J; Perez-Losada J
Biochem Cell Biol; 2007 Aug; 85(4):497-508. PubMed ID: 17713584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. High resolution array in the clinical approach to chromosomal phenotypes.
Filges I; Suda L; Weber P; Datta AN; Fischer D; Dill P; Glanzmann R; Benzing J; Hegi L; Wenzel F; Huber AR; Mori AC; Miny P; Röthlisberger B
Gene; 2012 Mar; 495(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 22240311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
