336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17065749)
1. A comparative biomechanical analysis of implants for the stabilization of proximal humerus fractures.
Füchtmeier B; May R; Fierlbeck J; Hammer J; Nerlich M
Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):261-70. PubMed ID: 17065749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proximal humerus fractures: a comparative biomechanical analysis of intra and extramedullary implants.
Füchtmeier B; May R; Hente R; Maghsudi M; Völk M; Hammer J; Nerlich M; Prantl L
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2007 Aug; 127(6):441-7. PubMed ID: 17457598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proximal humeral fractures: how stiff should an implant be? A comparative mechanical study with new implants in human specimens.
Lill H; Hepp P; Korner J; Kassi JP; Verheyden AP; Josten C; Duda GN
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Apr; 123(2-3):74-81. PubMed ID: 12721684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proximal humerus fracture rotational stability after fixation using a locking plate or a fixed-angle locked nail: the role of implant stiffness.
Foruria AM; Carrascal MT; Revilla C; Munuera L; Sanchez-Sotelo J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 May; 25(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 20153916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intramedullary stabilization of extraarticular proximal tibial fractures: a biomechanical comparison of intramedullary and extramedullary implants including a new proximal tibia nail (PTN).
Hansen M; Mehler D; Hessmann MH; Blum J; Rommens PM
J Orthop Trauma; 2007; 21(10):701-9. PubMed ID: 17986887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Biomechanical comparative study of three types of osteosynthesis in the treatment of supra and intercondylar fractures of the humerus in adults].
Fornasiéri C; Staub C; Tourné Y; Rumelhart C; Saragaglia D
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 9255359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Angle-fixed plate fixation or double-plate osteosynthesis in fractures of the proximal humerus: a biomechanical study].
Hessmann MH; Korner J; Hofmann A; Sternstein W; Rommens PM
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Jun; 53(3):130-7. PubMed ID: 18601621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical evaluation of 3-part proximal humerus fractures: a cadaveric study.
Gillespie RJ; Ramachandran V; Lea ES; Vallier HA
Orthopedics; 2009 Nov; 32(11):816. PubMed ID: 19902894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaveric and synthetic humeri.
Siffri PC; Peindl RD; Coley ER; Norton J; Connor PM; Kellam JF
J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Sep; 20(8):547-54. PubMed ID: 16990726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Locked vs. unlocked plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus - a biomechanical study.
Seide K; Triebe J; Faschingbauer M; Schulz AP; Püschel K; Mehrtens G; Jürgens Ch
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Feb; 22(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 17134800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. A biomechanical evaluation of two fixation techniques.
Edwards SL; Wilson NA; Zhang LQ; Flores S; Merk BR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Oct; 88(10):2258-64. PubMed ID: 17015605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Proximal humeral fractures: what is semi-rigid? Biomechanical properties of semi-rigid implants, a biomechanical cadaver based evaluation.
Kralinger F; Gschwentner M; Wambacher M; Smekal V; Haid C
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Feb; 128(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 18040704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Development of static three dimensional screw-plate system and the biomechanic features thereof, a comparative study].
Liang JY; Li KH; Liao QD; Zhu Y; Hu YH; Lei GH
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jan; 89(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 19489236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model.
Crist BD; Khalafi A; Hazelwood SJ; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):622-7. PubMed ID: 19897982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Are angle-fixed implants with elastic properties advantageous for the internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures?].
Hessmann MH; Sternstein W; Mehler D; Korner J; Hofmann A; Rommens PM
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 Dec; 49(12):345-50. PubMed ID: 15655927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of a unique locking plate versus a standard plate for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures in a cadaveric model.
Walsh S; Reindl R; Harvey E; Berry G; Beckman L; Steffen T
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Dec; 21(10):1027-31. PubMed ID: 16919375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur.
Harris T; Ruth JT; Szivek J; Haywood B
J Trauma; 2003 May; 54(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 12777906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate.
Heiney JP; Barnett MD; Vrabec GA; Schoenfeld AJ; Baji A; Njus GO
J Trauma; 2009 Feb; 66(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 19204519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Plate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: a biomechanical comparison of three different implants.
Scolaro JA; Hsu JE; Svach DJ; Mehta S
Injury; 2014 Dec; 45(12):2040-4. PubMed ID: 25249244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical analysis of plate osteosynthesis systems for proximal humerus fractures.
Lever JP; Aksenov SA; Zdero R; Ahn H; McKee MD; Schemitsch EH
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jan; 22(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 18176161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
