336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17065749)
21. A biomechanical comparison of two volar locked plates in a dorsally unstable distal radius fracture model.
Liporace FA; Kubiak EN; Jeong GK; Iesaka K; Egol KA; Koval KJ
J Trauma; 2006 Sep; 61(3):668-72. PubMed ID: 16967005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical comparison of two different periarticular plating systems for stabilization of complex distal humerus fractures.
Schwartz A; Oka R; Odell T; Mahar A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):950-5. PubMed ID: 16782245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Internal fixation of dorsally comminuted fractures of the distal part of the radius: a biomechanical analysis of volar plate and intramedullary nail fracture stability.
Konstantinidis L; Helwig P; Seifert J; Hirschmüller A; Liodakis E; Südkamp NP; Oberst M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Nov; 131(11):1529-37. PubMed ID: 21744234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mechanical comparison in cadaver specimens of three different 90-degree double-plate osteosyntheses for simulated C2-type distal humerus fractures with varying bone densities.
Schuster I; Korner J; Arzdorf M; Schwieger K; Diederichs G; Linke B
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 18349779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical analysis of distal femur fracture fixation: fixed-angle screw-plate construct versus condylar blade plate.
Higgins TF; Pittman G; Hines J; Bachus KN
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jan; 21(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17211268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?
Ahmad M; Nanda R; Bajwa AS; Candal-Couto J; Green S; Hui AC
Injury; 2007 Mar; 38(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 17296199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical evaluation of a new fixation technique for internal fixation of three-part proximal humerus fractures in a novel cadaveric model.
Brianza S; Plecko M; Gueorguiev B; Windolf M; Schwieger K
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Nov; 25(9):886-92. PubMed ID: 20655635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Locked plate fixation and intramedullary nailing for proximal humerus fractures: a biomechanical evaluation.
Hessmann MH; Hansen WS; Krummenauer F; Pol TF; Rommens P
J Trauma; 2005 Jun; 58(6):1194-201. PubMed ID: 15995470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures].
Hessmann MH; Sternstein W; Krummenauer F; Hofmann A; Rommens PM
Chirurg; 2005 Feb; 76(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 15378166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical comparison of fixed-angle volar plate versus fixed-angle volar plate plus fragment-specific fixation in a cadaveric distal radius fracture model.
Grindel SI; Wang M; Gerlach M; McGrady LM; Brown S
J Hand Surg Am; 2007 Feb; 32(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 17275594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mechanical evaluation of a new minimally invasive device for stabilization of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a cadaver study.
Duda GN; Epari DR; Babst R; Lambert SM; Matthys R; Südkamp NP
Acta Orthop; 2007 Jun; 78(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 17611860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical in vitro assessment of screw augmentation in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures.
Röderer G; Scola A; Schmölz W; Gebhard F; Windolf M; Hofmann-Fliri L
Injury; 2013 Oct; 44(10):1327-32. PubMed ID: 23769470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Factors influencing interlocking screw failure in unreamed small diameter nails--a biomechanical study using a distal tibia fracture model.
Weninger P; Schueller M; Jamek M; Stanzl-Tschegg S; Redl H; Tschegg EK
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 May; 24(4):379-84. PubMed ID: 19231049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Anatomical and biomechanical evaluation of an intramedullary nail for fractures of proximal humerus fractures based on tuberosity fixation.
Clavert P; Hatzidakis A; Boileau P
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():108-12. PubMed ID: 26743868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Distal humerus internal fixation: a biomechanical comparison of 90° and parallel constructs.
Kollias CM; Darcy SP; Reed JG; Rosvold JM; Shrive NG; Hildebrand KA
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2010 Sep; 39(9):440-4. PubMed ID: 21290022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The biomechanical performance of locking plate fixation with intramedullary fibular strut graft augmentation in the treatment of unstable fractures of the proximal humerus.
Bae JH; Oh JK; Chon CS; Oh CW; Hwang JH; Yoon YC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jul; 93(7):937-41. PubMed ID: 21705567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A biomechanical comparison of various methods of stabilization of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur.
Tencer AF; Johnson KD; Johnston DW; Gill K
J Orthop Res; 1984; 2(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 6491820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical comparison of two side plate fixation techniques in an unstable intertrochanteric osteotomy model: Sliding Hip Screw and Percutaneous Compression Plate.
Krischak GD; Augat P; Beck A; Arand M; Baier B; Blakytny R; Gebhard F; Claes L
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Dec; 22(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 17900766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures using one locking plate versus two reconstruction plates: a laboratory study.
Tejwani NC; Murthy A; Park J; McLaurin TM; Egol KA; Kummer FJ
J Trauma; 2009 Mar; 66(3):795-9. PubMed ID: 19276755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. PEEK versus titanium locking plates for proximal humerus fracture fixation: a comparative biomechanical study in two- and three-part fractures.
Schliemann B; Seifert R; Theisen C; Gehweiler D; Wähnert D; Schulze M; Raschke MJ; Weimann A
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Jan; 137(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 28005168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
