These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17065778)

  • 1. A comparative evaluation of four restorative materials to support undermined occlusal enamel of permanent teeth.
    Prabhakar AR; Thejokrishna P; Kurthukoti AJ
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2006 Sep; 24(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 17065778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
    Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Support of occlusal enamel provided by bonded restorations.
    Grisanti LP; Troendle KB; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 14753332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
    Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of antibacterial varnishes applied to root dentin on shear bond strength of tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Korkmaz Y; Baseren M
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 18335735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of laser pretreated enamel and dentin of primary teeth on microleakage of different restorative materials.
    Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 9796497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials.
    Almuammar MF; Schulman A; Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 12049082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of fluorosis on shear bond strength of glass ionomer-based restorative materials to dentin.
    Awliya WY; Akpata ES
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 10050116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of airborne-particle abrasion on the shear bond strength of four restorative materials to enamel and dentin.
    Mujdeci A; Gokay O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 15343159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bond strengths of fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
    Fruits TJ; Duncanson MG; Miller RC
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):219-22. PubMed ID: 9545909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adhesion of single application bonding systems to bovine enamel and dentin.
    Miyazaki M; Iwasaki K; Onose H
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 11817473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the cervical integrity during occlusal loading of Class II restorations.
    Campos PE; Barceleiro Mde O; Sampaio-Filho HR; Martins LR
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18335734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shear bond strength of amalgam reinforced with a bonding agent and/or dentin pins.
    Sen D; Nayir E; Cetiner F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Apr; 87(4):446-50. PubMed ID: 12011862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tensile bond strengths of five luting agents to two CAD-CAM restorative materials and enamel.
    Chang JC; Hart DA; Estey AW; Chan JT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jul; 90(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 12869970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of Class V restorations using two different compomer systems: an in vitro study.
    Estafan D; Pines MS; Erakin C; Fuerst PF
    J Clin Dent; 1999; 10(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 10825860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive dentistry: bond strength of different sealant and filling materials to enamel.
    Alonso RC; Correr GM; Borges AF; Kantovitz KR; Rontani RM
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2005; 3(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 16173385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.