These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17065826)

  • 1. Diagnostics of the cochlear amplifier by means of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Janssen T; Niedermeyer HP; Arnold W
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2006; 68(6):334-9. PubMed ID: 17065826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A review of the effectiveness of otoacoustic emissions for evaluating hearing status after newborn screening.
    Janssen T
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1058-63. PubMed ID: 23628790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Middle ear and cochlear disorders result in different DPOAE growth behaviour: implications for the differentiation of sound conductive and cochlear hearing loss.
    Gehr DD; Janssen T; Michaelis CE; Deingruber K; Lamm K
    Hear Res; 2004 Jul; 193(1-2):9-19. PubMed ID: 15219315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Diagnostics of the cochlear amplifier by means of DPOAE growth functions].
    Janssen T
    HNO; 2005 Feb; 53(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 15549210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Assessment of cochlear function with distortion products of otoacoustic emissions in acoustic neuroma].
    Oeken J
    HNO; 1996 Dec; 44(12):677-84. PubMed ID: 9081952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears.
    Boege P; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1810-8. PubMed ID: 12002865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses.
    Mills DM
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):508-25. PubMed ID: 16957501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-source interference as the major reason for auditory-threshold estimation error based on DPOAE input-output functions in normal-hearing subjects.
    Dalhoff E; Turcanu D; Vetešník A; Gummer AW
    Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():67-82. PubMed ID: 23268357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Possibility for quantitative and frequency-specific assessment of auditory threshold with otoacoustic emissions].
    Dreher A; Suckfüll M; Schneeweiss S; Schorn K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Jan; 76(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 9156504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of pure-tone thresholds in adults using extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output-functions and auditory steady state responses.
    Hatzopoulos S; Ciorba A; Petruccelli J; Grasso D; Sliwa L; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H; Martini A
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(9):625-31. PubMed ID: 19925336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognostic validity of dichotic multiple frequencies auditory steady-state responses versus distortion product otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high risk neonates.
    Mahmoudian S; Farhadi M; Kadivar M; Ghalehbaghi B; Rahimi F; Hemami MR; Kamrava SK; Asghari A; Amintehran E; Mohagheghi P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 75(9):1109-16. PubMed ID: 21719120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Automated hearing threshold estimation in newborns using extrapolated DPOAE input/output functions].
    Janssen T; Klein A; Gehr DD
    HNO; 2003 Dec; 51(12):971-80. PubMed ID: 14647926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Audiology characteristics in newborns and infants who failed in the hearing screening by transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions: 89 cases study].
    Huang LH; Deng XQ; Yang YL; Wang SJ; Tang XQ; Guo LS; Han DM
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Mar; 46(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 21575409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An objective method of analyzing cochlear versus noncochlear patterns of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in patients with acoustic neuromas.
    Telischi F
    Laryngoscope; 2000 Apr; 110(4):553-62. PubMed ID: 10763999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Transitory evoked and distortion products of otoacoustic emissions in absent auditory evoked potentials].
    Schöler C; Schönweiler R; Ptok M
    HNO; 1997 Dec; 45(12):1008-15. PubMed ID: 9486382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emission levels with negative tympanometric peak pressure in infants and toddlers.
    Prieve BA; Calandruccio L; Fitzgerald T; Mazevski A; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 18469719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A comparison of auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high-risk neonates].
    Xu FL; Xing QJ; Cheng XY
    Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 10(4):460-3. PubMed ID: 18706161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-frequency hearing impairment assessed with cochlear microphonics.
    Zhang M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 132(9):967-73. PubMed ID: 22667466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of cochlear hearing status in dogs using evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Gonçalves R; McBrearty A; Pratola L; Calvo G; Anderson TJ; Penderis J
    J Small Anim Pract; 2012 Jun; 53(6):344-51. PubMed ID: 22647213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.