388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17065826)
1. Diagnostics of the cochlear amplifier by means of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Janssen T; Niedermeyer HP; Arnold W
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2006; 68(6):334-9. PubMed ID: 17065826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A review of the effectiveness of otoacoustic emissions for evaluating hearing status after newborn screening.
Janssen T
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1058-63. PubMed ID: 23628790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Middle ear and cochlear disorders result in different DPOAE growth behaviour: implications for the differentiation of sound conductive and cochlear hearing loss.
Gehr DD; Janssen T; Michaelis CE; Deingruber K; Lamm K
Hear Res; 2004 Jul; 193(1-2):9-19. PubMed ID: 15219315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
Hoth S
Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Diagnostics of the cochlear amplifier by means of DPOAE growth functions].
Janssen T
HNO; 2005 Feb; 53(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 15549210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Assessment of cochlear function with distortion products of otoacoustic emissions in acoustic neuroma].
Oeken J
HNO; 1996 Dec; 44(12):677-84. PubMed ID: 9081952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears.
Boege P; Janssen T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1810-8. PubMed ID: 12002865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses.
Mills DM
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):508-25. PubMed ID: 16957501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-source interference as the major reason for auditory-threshold estimation error based on DPOAE input-output functions in normal-hearing subjects.
Dalhoff E; Turcanu D; Vetešník A; Gummer AW
Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():67-82. PubMed ID: 23268357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Possibility for quantitative and frequency-specific assessment of auditory threshold with otoacoustic emissions].
Dreher A; Suckfüll M; Schneeweiss S; Schorn K
Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Jan; 76(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 9156504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of pure-tone thresholds in adults using extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output-functions and auditory steady state responses.
Hatzopoulos S; Ciorba A; Petruccelli J; Grasso D; Sliwa L; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H; Martini A
Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(9):625-31. PubMed ID: 19925336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic validity of dichotic multiple frequencies auditory steady-state responses versus distortion product otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high risk neonates.
Mahmoudian S; Farhadi M; Kadivar M; Ghalehbaghi B; Rahimi F; Hemami MR; Kamrava SK; Asghari A; Amintehran E; Mohagheghi P
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 75(9):1109-16. PubMed ID: 21719120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Automated hearing threshold estimation in newborns using extrapolated DPOAE input/output functions].
Janssen T; Klein A; Gehr DD
HNO; 2003 Dec; 51(12):971-80. PubMed ID: 14647926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Audiology characteristics in newborns and infants who failed in the hearing screening by transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions: 89 cases study].
Huang LH; Deng XQ; Yang YL; Wang SJ; Tang XQ; Guo LS; Han DM
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Mar; 46(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 21575409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An objective method of analyzing cochlear versus noncochlear patterns of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in patients with acoustic neuromas.
Telischi F
Laryngoscope; 2000 Apr; 110(4):553-62. PubMed ID: 10763999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Transitory evoked and distortion products of otoacoustic emissions in absent auditory evoked potentials].
Schöler C; Schönweiler R; Ptok M
HNO; 1997 Dec; 45(12):1008-15. PubMed ID: 9486382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emission levels with negative tympanometric peak pressure in infants and toddlers.
Prieve BA; Calandruccio L; Fitzgerald T; Mazevski A; Georgantas LM
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 18469719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A comparison of auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high-risk neonates].
Xu FL; Xing QJ; Cheng XY
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 10(4):460-3. PubMed ID: 18706161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-frequency hearing impairment assessed with cochlear microphonics.
Zhang M
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 132(9):967-73. PubMed ID: 22667466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of cochlear hearing status in dogs using evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Gonçalves R; McBrearty A; Pratola L; Calvo G; Anderson TJ; Penderis J
J Small Anim Pract; 2012 Jun; 53(6):344-51. PubMed ID: 22647213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
