204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17066637)
1. Fixation of 5-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures and resulting bone loading: a finite element assessment based on in vivo strain measurements.
Karl M; Winter W; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):756-62. PubMed ID: 17066637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Loading of bone surrounding implants through three-unit fixed partial denture fixation: a finite-element analysis based on in vitro and in vivo strain measurements.
Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16672032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures.
Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 17927737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures.
Karl M; Winter W; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 14982352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 15248882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Static implant loading caused by as-cast metal and ceramic-veneered superstructures.
Karl M; Rosch S; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 15798682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo stress behavior in cemented and screw-retained five-unit implant FPDs.
Karl M; Taylor TD; Wichmann MG; Heckmann SM
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 16433647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone adaptation induced by non-passively fitting implant superstructures: a finite element analysis based on in vivo strain measurements.
Winter W; Taylor TD; Karl M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1288-95. PubMed ID: 22167435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis of 2 immediate loading systems in edentulous mandible: rigid and semirigid splinting of implants.
Teixeira MF; Ramalho SA; de Mattias Sartori IA; Lehmann RB
Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20147815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structural changes in ceramic veneered three-unit implant-supported restorations as a consequence of static and dynamic loading.
Karl M; Fischer H; Graef F; Wichmann MG; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 17669484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Different bone loading patterns due to fixation of three-unit and five-unit implant prostheses.
Karl M; Winter W; Dickinson AJ; Wichmann MG; Heckmann SM
Aust Dent J; 2007 Mar; 52(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 17500164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro strain gauge analysis of axial and off-axial loading on implant supported fixed partial dentures.
Cehreli MC; Iplikçioglu H
Implant Dent; 2002; 11(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 12271568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress analysis in edentulous mandibular bone supporting implant-retained 1-piece or multiple superstructures.
Yokoyama S; Wakabayashi N; Shiota M; Ohyama T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):578-83. PubMed ID: 16161742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Strain development in 3-unit implant-supported CAD/CAM restorations.
Karl M; Wichmann MG; Heckmann SM; Krafft T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):648-52. PubMed ID: 18807560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis.
Watanabe F; Uno I; Hata Y; Neuendorff G; Kirsch A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 10795453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
