These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17067415)

  • 61. Comparison of two theories of "ratio" and "difference" judgments.
    Birnbaum MH
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Sep; 109(3):304-19. PubMed ID: 6447191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Understanding bias in proportion production.
    Hollands JG; Tanaka T; Dyre BP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):563-74. PubMed ID: 12075888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Ordinal properties of subjective ratios and differences: Comment on Veit.
    Rule SJ; Curtis DW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Sep; 109(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 6447190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The law of categorical judgment (Corrected) and the interpretation of changes in psychophysical performance.
    Rosner BS; Kochanski G
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 19159150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Cross-modality matching in memory psychophysics: brightness and loudness.
    Hubbard TL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Jun; 76(3 Pt 2):1339-57. PubMed ID: 8337090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Judging multi-minute intervals retrospectively.
    Grondin S; Plourde M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Sep; 60(9):1303-12. PubMed ID: 17676560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Realism of confidence in sensory discrimination: the underconfidence phenomenon.
    Björkman M; Juslin P; Winman A
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 8351190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The discriminability of remembered magnitudes.
    Baranski JV; Petrusic WM
    Mem Cognit; 1992 May; 20(3):254-70. PubMed ID: 1508051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. DLs in reminder and 2AFC tasks: data and models.
    Ulrich R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1179-98. PubMed ID: 20436209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Using the Mixed Rasch Model to analyze data from the beliefs and attitudes about memory survey.
    Smith EV; Ying Y; Brown SW
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(1):23-40. PubMed ID: 22677495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Judgement bias in pigs is independent of performance in a spatial holeboard task and conditional discrimination learning.
    Roelofs S; Murphy E; Ni H; Gieling E; Nordquist RE; van der Staay FJ
    Anim Cogn; 2017 Jul; 20(4):739-753. PubMed ID: 28508125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: computational analyses and computer simulations.
    Kosslyn SM; Chabris CF; Marsolek CJ; Koenig O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):562-77. PubMed ID: 1593235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Comparing the regression slopes of independent groups.
    Ng M; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):319-40. PubMed ID: 19807946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Form perception: dimensions of pattern reproduction.
    Mavrides CM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Dec; 33(3):767-73. PubMed ID: 4942513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Loci of contextual effects in judgment.
    Mellers BA; Birnbaum MH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Aug; 8(4):582-601. PubMed ID: 6214609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Detection and identification: how are they related?
    Thomas JP
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1985 Sep; 2(9):1457-67. PubMed ID: 4045580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The Prep statistic as a measure of confidence in model fitting.
    Ashby FG; O'Brien JB
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 18605475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Putting the psychology back into psychological models: mechanistic versus rational approaches.
    Sakamoto Y; Jones M; Love BC
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1057-65. PubMed ID: 18927024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Confidence intervals for the parameters of psychometric functions.
    Maloney LT
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 2304811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Using the standard staircase to measure the point of subjective equality: a guide based on computer simulations.
    Meese TS
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Apr; 57(3):267-81. PubMed ID: 7770319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.