805 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17068376)
1. Comparison of PENELOPE Monte Carlo dose calculations with Fricke dosimeter and ionization chamber measurements in heterogeneous phantoms (18 MeV electron and 12 MV photon beams).
Blazy L; Baltes D; Bordy JM; Cutarella D; Delaunay F; Gouriou J; Leroy E; Ostrowsky A; Beaumont S
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5951-65. PubMed ID: 17068376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of PENFAST--a fast Monte Carlo code for dose calculations in photon and electron radiotherapy treatment planning.
Habib B; Poumarede B; Tola F; Barthe J
Phys Med; 2010 Jan; 26(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 19342258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo simulation of a medical linear accelerator for radiotherapy use.
Serrano B; Hachem A; Franchisseur E; Hérault J; Marcié S; Costa A; Bensadoun RJ; Barthe J; Gérard JP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):506-9. PubMed ID: 16644964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monte Carlo simulation of the photon beam characteristics from medical linear accelerators.
Kim HK; Han SJ; Kim JL; Kim BH; Chang SY; Lee JK
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):510-3. PubMed ID: 16644954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.
Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of transverse magnetic fields on dose distribution and RBE of photon beams: comparing PENELOPE and EGS4 Monte Carlo codes.
Nettelbeck H; Takacs GJ; Rosenfeld AB
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):5123-37. PubMed ID: 18723929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo simulation of MOSFET detectors for high-energy photon beams using the PENELOPE code.
Panettieri V; Duch MA; Jornet N; Ginjaume M; Carrasco P; Badal A; Ortega X; Ribas M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):303-16. PubMed ID: 17183143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benchmark of penelope for low and medium energy X-rays.
Chica U; Anguiano M; Lallena AM
Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 18495512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surface and build-up region dose analysis for clinical radiotherapy photon beams.
Ishmael Parsai E; Shvydka D; Pearson D; Gopalakrishnan M; Feldmeier JJ
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Oct; 66(10):1438-42. PubMed ID: 18434173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation transport calculations for 50 MV photon therapy beam using the Monte Carlo code GEANT4.
Larsson S; Svensson R; Gudowska I; Ivanchenko V; Brahme A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):503-7. PubMed ID: 16381775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental verification of a commercial Monte Carlo-based dose calculation module for high-energy photon beams.
Künzler T; Fotina I; Stock M; Georg D
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(24):7363-77. PubMed ID: 19934489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium.
Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Weber L; Ginjaume M; Eudaldo T; Jurado D; Ruiz A; Ribas M
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2899-911. PubMed ID: 15543799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An efficient framework for photon Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Fix MK; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Mini R; Born EJ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):N425-37. PubMed ID: 17881793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using a photon phase-space source for convolution/superposition dose calculations in radiation therapy.
Naqvi SA; D'Souza WD; Earl MA; Ye SJ; Shih R; Li XA
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4111-24. PubMed ID: 16177534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient-specific dosimetry of conventional and intensity modulated radiation therapy using a novel full Monte Carlo phase space reconstruction method from electronic portal images.
Jarry G; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2277-99. PubMed ID: 17404469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A practical Monte Carlo MU verification tool for IMRT quality assurance.
Fan J; Li J; Chen L; Stathakis S; Luo W; Du Plessis F; Xiong W; Yang J; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2503-15. PubMed ID: 16675866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
