These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17068379)

  • 1. Expanding an existing multiple choice test with a mixed format test: simulation study on sample size and item recovery in concurrent calibration.
    Paek I; Young MJ
    J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(4):394-406. PubMed ID: 17068379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing concurrent versus fixed parameter equating with common items: using the dichotomous and partial credit models in a mixed-item format test.
    Taherbhai HM; Seo DY
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 17215567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expected linking error resulting from item parameter drift among the common Items on Rasch calibrated tests.
    Miller GE; Gesn PR; Rotou J
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15701943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of model misfit on partial credit model parameter estimates.
    Penfield RD
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):115-28. PubMed ID: 15064532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of data collection design, linking method, and sample size on vertical scaling using the Rasch model.
    Paek I; Young MJ; Yi Q
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(3):229-48. PubMed ID: 18753693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based practice for equating health status items: sample size and IRT model.
    Cook KF; Taylor PW; Dodd BG; Teal CR; McHorney CA
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 17440260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy.
    Stark S; Chernyshenko OS; Drasgow F
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Nov; 91(6):1292-306. PubMed ID: 17100485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parameter recovery for the partial credit model using MULTILOG.
    Choi SW; Cook KF; Dodd BG
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(2):114-42. PubMed ID: 9661717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple imputation for item scores when test data are factorially complex.
    van Ginkel JR; van der Ark LA; Sijtsma K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):315-37. PubMed ID: 17971272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using effect sizes for research reporting: examples using item response theory to analyze differential item functioning.
    Steinberg L; Thissen D
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):402-15. PubMed ID: 17154754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test equating in the presence of DIF items.
    Chu KL; Kamata A
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(3):342-54. PubMed ID: 15942075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Format selection in machine-scored classroom achievement tests.
    Kolstad RK; Wagner MJ; Kolstad RA
    J Dent Educ; 1985 Dec; 49(12):799-803. PubMed ID: 3864827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of equating methodology on reported trends in PISA.
    Gebhardt E; Adams RJ
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 17804896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rasch analysis of distractors in multiple-choice items.
    Wang WC
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(1):43-65. PubMed ID: 9661731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Equating and item banking with the Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(4):409-34. PubMed ID: 12077465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving measurement precision of test batteries using multidimensional item response models.
    Wang WC; Chen PH; Cheng YY
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):116-36. PubMed ID: 15053722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bookmark locations and item response model selection in the presence of local item dependence.
    Skaggs G
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 17215566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factorial modeling of differential distractor functioning in multiple-choice items.
    Wang WC
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(3):238-56. PubMed ID: 12029170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Item parameter drift in computerized adaptive testing: Study with eCAT].
    Abad FJ; Olea J; Aguado D; Ponsoda V; Barrada JR
    Psicothema; 2010 May; 22(2):340-7. PubMed ID: 20423641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.