159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17069322)
1. Formant transitions in fricative identification: the role of native fricative inventory.
Wagner A; Ernestus M; Cutler A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2267-77. PubMed ID: 17069322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acoustically distinct and perceptually ambiguous: ʔayʔaǰuθəm (Salish) fricatives.
Mellesmoen G; Babel M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Apr; 147(4):2959. PubMed ID: 32359305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of vocalic formant transitions and vowel quality on the English [s]-[ŝ] boundary.
Whalen DH
J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jan; 69(1):275-82. PubMed ID: 7217525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-language similarities and differences in the uptake of place information.
Wagner A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4256-67. PubMed ID: 23742376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of voicing in fricatives and fricative clusters.
Stevens KN; Blumstein SE; Glicksman L; Burton M; Kurowski K
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2979-3000. PubMed ID: 1629490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. English vowel identification and vowel formant discrimination by native Mandarin Chinese- and native English-speaking listeners: The effect of vowel duration dependence.
Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Guan J; Liu C
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():58-65. PubMed ID: 26768853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perception of the English /s/-/integral of/ distinction relies on fricative noises and transitions, not on brief spectral slices.
Whalen DH
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1776-85. PubMed ID: 1960273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of speaker variability and noise on Mandarin fricative identification by native and non-native listeners.
Lee CY; Zhang Y; Li X; Tao L; Bond ZS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1130-40. PubMed ID: 22894232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of Phonemes: Differences between Phoneme Classes and the Effect of Class Size.
Wagner A; Ernestus M
Phonetica; 2008; 65(1-2):106-27. PubMed ID: 18523368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acoustic characteristics of fricatives, amplitude of formants and clarity of speech produced without and with a medical mask.
Nguyen DD; Chacon A; Payten C; Black R; Sheth M; McCabe P; Novakovic D; Madill C
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2022 Mar; 57(2):366-380. PubMed ID: 35166414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of acoustic cues for phonetic identification: effects of spectral degradation and electric hearing.
Winn MB; Chatterjee M; Idsardi WJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1465-79. PubMed ID: 22352517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-modal cross-linguistic perception of fricatives in clear speech.
Cho S; Jongman A; Wang Y; Sereno JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Apr; 147(4):2609. PubMed ID: 32359282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of acoustic cues on labeling fricatives and affricates.
Hedrick M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 40(4):925-38. PubMed ID: 9263955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Listener expectations and gender bias in nonsibilant fricative perception.
Babel M; McGuire G
Phonetica; 2013; 70(1-2):117-51. PubMed ID: 24157437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of relative amplitude and formant transitions on perception of place of articulation by adult listeners with cochlear implants.
Hedrick MS; Carney AE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1445-57. PubMed ID: 9430763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Formant discrimination of speech and non-speech sounds for English and Chinese listeners.
Liu C; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):EL189-95. PubMed ID: 22979831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Language specificity in the perception of voiceless sibilant fricatives in Japanese and English: implications for cross-language differences in speech-sound development.
Li F; Munson B; Edwards J; Yoneyama K; Hall K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):999-1011. PubMed ID: 21361456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perception of final fricative voicing: native and nonnative listeners' use of vowel duration.
Broersma M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1636-44. PubMed ID: 20329862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phonological versus phonetic cues in native and non-native listening: Korean and Dutch listeners' perception of Dutch and English consonants.
Cho T; McQueen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):3085-96. PubMed ID: 16708963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
