These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17069322)

  • 21. Learning to perceive speech: how fricative perception changes, and how it stays the same.
    Nittrouer S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):711-9. PubMed ID: 12186050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the role of the amplitude of the fricative noise in the perception of place of articulation in voiceless fricative consonants.
    Behrens S; Blumstein SE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):861-7. PubMed ID: 3183204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Acoustic analysis and perception of Spanish fricative consonants.
    de Manrique AM; Massone MI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Apr; 69(4):1145-53. PubMed ID: 7229202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Age and hearing loss and the use of acoustic cues in fricative categorization.
    Scharenborg O; Weber A; Janse E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1408-17. PubMed ID: 26428779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perception of familiar contrasts in unfamiliar positions.
    Broersma M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jun; 117(6):3890-901. PubMed ID: 16018491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Listeners retune phoneme categories across languages.
    Reinisch E; Weber A; Mitterer H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 22545600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What Comes After /f/? Prediction in Speech Derives From Data-Explanatory Processes.
    McMurray B; Jongman A
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Jan; 27(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 26581947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Listeners can anticipate future segments before they identify the current one.
    Schreiber KE; McMurray B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1147-1166. PubMed ID: 31087271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Articulatory and Acoustic Characteristics of German Fricative Clusters.
    Pouplier M; Hoole P
    Phonetica; 2016; 73(1):52-78. PubMed ID: 26855044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Greater sensitivity to prosodic goodness in non-native than in native listeners (L).
    Cutler A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3522-5. PubMed ID: 19507933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does harmonicity explain children's cue weighting of fricative-vowel syllables?
    Nittrouer S; Lowenstein JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):1679-92. PubMed ID: 19275325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners.
    Cutler A; Weber A; Smits R; Cooper N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3668-78. PubMed ID: 15658717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of language on the acoustic properties of phonetic features: a study of the feature [strident] in Ewe and English.
    Utman JA; Blumstein SE
    Phonetica; 1994; 51(4):221-38. PubMed ID: 7938204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fricative-stop coarticulation: acoustic and perceptual evidence.
    Repp BH; Mann VA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Jun; 71(6):1562-7. PubMed ID: 7108031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Flexible cue use in nonnative phonetic categorization.
    Broersma M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):712-5. PubMed ID: 18681562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fickle fricatives: Fricative and stop perception in Gurindji Kriol, Roper Kriol, and Standard Australian English.
    Stewart J; Meakins F; Algy C; Ennever T; Joshua A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Apr; 147(4):2766. PubMed ID: 32359298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Context effects in two-month-old infants' perception of labiodental/interdental fricative contrasts.
    Levitt A; Jusczyk PW; Murray J; Carden G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Aug; 14(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 2971766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of coarticulatory effects in the perception of fricatives by children and adults.
    Nittrouer S; Studdert-Kennedy M
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Sep; 30(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 3669639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dynamic information in the identification and discrimination of vowels.
    Fox RA
    Phonetica; 1989; 46(1-3):97-116. PubMed ID: 2608728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.