These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17069322)

  • 41. The role of coarticulatory effects in the perception of fricatives by children and adults.
    Nittrouer S; Studdert-Kennedy M
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Sep; 30(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 3669639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Dynamic information in the identification and discrimination of vowels.
    Fox RA
    Phonetica; 1989; 46(1-3):97-116. PubMed ID: 2608728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An articulatory and acoustic study of the fricative clusters /sʃ/ and /ʃs/ in Catalan.
    Recasens D; Mira M
    Phonetica; 2013; 70(4):298-322. PubMed ID: 24514160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effects of prosodic boundary on /aC/ sequences: acoustic results.
    Tabain M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):516-31. PubMed ID: 12558288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Perceptual integration of acoustic cues to laryngeal contrasts in Korean fricatives.
    Lee S; Katz J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):605-11. PubMed ID: 26936544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.
    Jongman A; Wayland R; Wong S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1252-63. PubMed ID: 11008825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Predicting developmental shifts in perceptual weighting schemes.
    Nittrouer S; Miller ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Apr; 101(4):2253-66. PubMed ID: 9104027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: evidence from native and non-native listeners.
    Cooper N; Cutler A; Wales R
    Lang Speech; 2002 Sep; 45(Pt 3):207-28. PubMed ID: 12693685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The influence of perceived sexual orientation on fricative identification.
    Munson B; Jefferson SV; McDonald EC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2427-37. PubMed ID: 16642855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Focus, prosodic context, and phonological feature specification: patterns of variation in fricative production.
    Silbert N; de Jong K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2769-79. PubMed ID: 18529193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Using speech sounds to test functional spectral resolution in listeners with cochlear implants.
    Winn MB; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1430-42. PubMed ID: 25786954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems: perception of formant targets, formant movement, and duration.
    Iverson P; Evans BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2842-54. PubMed ID: 18189574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Perception and production of voiceless Spanish fricatives by Chicano children and adults.
    Greenlee M
    Lang Speech; 1992; 35 ( Pt 1-2)():173-87. PubMed ID: 1287387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The verbal transformation effect and the perceptual organization of speech: influence of formant transitions and F0-contour continuity.
    Stachurski M; Summers RJ; Roberts B
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():22-31. PubMed ID: 25620314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The Acoustics of Word-Initial Fricatives and Their Effect on Word-Level Intelligibility in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Reidy PF; Kristensen K; Winn MB; Litovsky RY; Edwards JR
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):42-56. PubMed ID: 27556521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. What Are You Waiting For? Real-Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.
    Galle ME; Klein-Packard J; Schreiber K; McMurray B
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Jan; 43(1):. PubMed ID: 30648798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Perception of intrusive /r/ in English by native, cross-language and cross-dialect listeners.
    Tuinman A; Mitterer H; Cutler A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1643-52. PubMed ID: 21895101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The role of stimulus cross-splicing in an event-related potentials study. Misleading formant transitions hinder automatic phonological processing.
    Steinberg J; Truckenbrodt H; Jacobsen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):3120-40. PubMed ID: 22501085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Coding pitch differences in voiceless fricatives: Whispered relative to normal speech.
    Heeren WF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3427-38. PubMed ID: 26723300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Category and perceptual interference in second-language phoneme learning: an examination of English /w/-/v/ learning by Sinhala, German, and Dutch speakers.
    Iverson P; Ekanayake D; Hamann S; Sennema A; Evans BG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1305-16. PubMed ID: 18823213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.