883 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17070192)
1. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Daya S;
Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1356-64. PubMed ID: 17070192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Daya S;
Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2006 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2189-201. PubMed ID: 19439295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2001 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Daya S;
Fertil Steril; 2005 Sep; 84(3):590-9. PubMed ID: 16169390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2004 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
Fertil Steril; 2008 May; 89(5):1123-1132. PubMed ID: 17706210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2007 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
Fertil Steril; 2011 Feb; 95(2):542-7.e1-10. PubMed ID: 20656287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2004.
Sullivan EA; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Adamson GD
Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1375-90. PubMed ID: 23442757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2000 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
;
Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1207-20. PubMed ID: 15136079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The singleton, term gestation, and live birth rate per cycle initiated: a 1-year experience in in vitro fertilization cycles with native and donated oocytes.
Bellver J; Albert C; Soares SR; Alvarez C; Pellicer A
Fertil Steril; 2005 May; 83(5):1404-9. PubMed ID: 15866576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
;
Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.
Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2003 Aug; 52(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 14532867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.
Oktay K; Cil AP; Bang H
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 16818031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use and outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection for non-male factor infertility.
Kim HH; Bundorf MK; Behr B; McCallum SW
Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):622-8. PubMed ID: 17445809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2000. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
Nyboe Andersen A; Gianaroli L; Nygren KG; ;
Hum Reprod; 2004 Mar; 19(3):490-503. PubMed ID: 14998942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assisted reproductive technology : experience with IVF/ICSI.
Rizvi JH; Zuberi NF; Bhatti S; Bana M; Virk S; Nadir S; Kidwai A; Tahir N
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2004 May; 14(5):270-3. PubMed ID: 15225453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome of 518 salvage oocyte-cryopreservation cycles performed as a routine procedure in an in vitro fertilization program.
La Sala GB; Nicoli A; Villani MT; Pescarini M; Gallinelli A; Blickstein I
Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1423-7. PubMed ID: 17070194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2001.
Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G; Kissin D
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2004 Apr; 53(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15123982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
Andersen AN; Goossens V; Ferraretti AP; Bhattacharya S; Felberbaum R; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; ;
Hum Reprod; 2008 Apr; 23(4):756-71. PubMed ID: 18281243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]