These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17070449)

  • 1. Comparison of LCD and CRT displays based on efficacy for digital mammography.
    Saunders RS; Samei E; Baker J; Delong D; Soo MS; Walsh R; Pisano E; Kuzmiak CM; Pavic D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1317-26. PubMed ID: 17070449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. LCD versus CRT monitors for digital mammography: a comparison of observer performance for the detection of clustered microcalcifications and masses.
    Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Lee EH; Park JS; Jang MJ
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1104-8. PubMed ID: 19922305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital mammography: comparative performance of color LCD and monochrome CRT displays.
    Samei E; Poolla A; Ulissey MJ; Lewin JM
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 17434067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of microcalcifications: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M; Uchida Y
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Sep; 48(7):714-20. PubMed ID: 17729000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors: an observer performance study.
    Kamitani T; Yabuuchi H; Soeda H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Sakai S; Furuya A; Hatakenaka M; Ishii N; Honda H
    Eur Radiol; 2007 May; 17(5):1365-71. PubMed ID: 17093968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On-axis and off-axis viewing of images on CRT displays and LCDs: observer performance and vision model predictions.
    Krupinski EA; Johnson J; Roehrig H; Nafziger J; Lubin J
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):957-64. PubMed ID: 16023384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of a human visual system model to predict observer performance with CRT vs LCD display of images.
    Krupinski EA; Johnson J; Roehrig H; Nafziger J; Fan J; Lubin J
    J Digit Imaging; 2004 Dec; 17(4):258-63. PubMed ID: 15692869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor.
    Kamitani T; Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Okafuji T; Sunami S; Hatakenaka M; Ishii N; Kubo M; Tokunaga E; Yamamoto H; Honda H
    Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 21872122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Full-field digital mammography on LCD versus CRT monitors.
    Zuley ML; Willison KM; Bonaccio E; Miller DP; Leong DL; Seifert PJ; Somerville P; Destounis S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1492-8. PubMed ID: 17114542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital mammography: effects of reduced radiation dose on diagnostic performance.
    Samei E; Saunders RS; Baker JA; Delong DM
    Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):396-404. PubMed ID: 17356178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Observer study for evaluating potential utility of a super-high-resolution LCD in the detection of clustered microcalcifications on digital mammograms.
    Shiraishi J; Abe H; Ichikawa K; Schmidt RA; Doi K
    J Digit Imaging; 2010 Apr; 23(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 19277785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitors and 5-megapixel liquid crystal monitors for soft-copy reading in full-field digital mammography.
    Schueller G; Schueller-Weidekamm C; Pinker K; Memarsadeghi M; Weber M; Helbich TH
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Oct; 76(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 19481396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does image quality matter? Impact of resolution and noise on mammographic task performance.
    Saunders RS; Baker JA; Delong DM; Johnson JP; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3971-81. PubMed ID: 17985642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of a perceptually linearized display on observer performance and visual search.
    Krupinski EA; Roehrig H
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Jan; 7(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 10645452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of LCD and CRT monitors for detection of pulmonary nodules and interstitial lung diseases on digital chest radiographs by using receiver operating characteristic analysis].
    Ikeda R; Katsuragawa S; Shimonobou T; Hiai Y; Hashida M; Awai K; Yamashita Y; Doi K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 May; 62(5):734-41. PubMed ID: 16733502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulation of mammographic lesions.
    Saunders R; Samei E; Baker J; Delong D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):860-70. PubMed ID: 16777560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intra- and interobserver agreement and performance score of breast phantom image interpretation: influence of ambient room lighting levels.
    Koyama K; Shimamoto K; Ikeda M; Muramoto H; Satake H; Sawaki A; Kato K; Fukushima H; Ishigaki T
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2006 Jun; 68(3-4):147-53. PubMed ID: 16967781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SCAR R&D Symposium 2003: comparing the efficacy of 5-MP CRT versus 3-MP LCD in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease.
    Langer S; Bartholmai B; Fetterly K; Harmsen S; Ryan W; Erickson B; Andriole K; Carrino J
    J Digit Imaging; 2004 Sep; 17(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 15534750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.