These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17070580)

  • 41. Clinical ability of pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in detecting visual dysfunction in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Parisi V; Miglior S; Manni G; Centofanti M; Bucci MG
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):216-28. PubMed ID: 16406535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Frequency doubling perimetry in diagnosis of early glaucomatous optic nerve fiber damage].
    Korzekwa W; Korzekwa M; Markowska J; Wójcik-Niklewska B; Romaniuk W; Korzekwa A; Michalska-Małecka K
    Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):222-4. PubMed ID: 15510506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Repeatability of frequency doubling technology perimetry (20-1 screening program) and the effect of pupillary dilatation on interpretation.
    Parikh R; Muliyil J; George R; Bhat S; Thomas R
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2008; 15(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 18300088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
    Spry PG; Johnson CA; McKendrick AM; Turpin A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 May; 42(6):1404-10. PubMed ID: 11328758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Validation of test duration as a screening criterion for frequency doubling perimetry.
    Thomas R; Parikh R; Muliyil J; Bhat S; George R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):562-3. PubMed ID: 15013885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessment of the Student Sight Savers Program methods for glaucoma screening.
    Salim S; Netland PA; Fung KH; Smith ME; Aldridge A
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2009; 16(4):238-42. PubMed ID: 19874145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of the high specificity Screening Program (C-20-1) of the Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimeter in clinical practice.
    North RV; Jones AL; Hunter E; Morgan JE; Wild JM
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Jun; 20(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 15999135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Frequency doubling technology for earlier detection of functional damage in standard automated perimetry-normal hemifield in glaucoma with low-to-normal pressure.
    Nakagawa S; Murata H; Saito H; Nakahara H; Mataki N; Tomidokoro A; Iwase A; Araie M
    J Glaucoma; 2012 Jan; 21(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 21543995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Application of frequency doubling technology perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma].
    Kawa P; Jurkowska J; Zarnowski T; Zagórski Z
    Klin Oczna; 2002; 104(5-6):391-4. PubMed ID: 12664488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Optimizing the use of frequency doubling technology perimetry in community vision screenings.
    Nehmad L; Madonna RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):559-65. PubMed ID: 18594349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
    Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Discriminating between normal and glaucoma-damaged eyes with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3.
    Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pajarín AB; Honrubia FM
    Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):775-781.e2. PubMed ID: 17870171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Prospective randomized comparative study of frequency doubling perimetry vs standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma].
    Kampmeier J; Eisert B; Buchwald HJ; Lang GK; Lang GE
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Mar; 218(3):157-67. PubMed ID: 11322052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of cataract extraction on frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Kook MS; Yang SJ; Kim S; Chung J; Kim ST; Tchah H
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 138(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 15234286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The reliability of frequency-doubling perimetry in young children.
    Blumenthal EZ; Haddad A; Horani A; Anteby I
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Mar; 111(3):435-9. PubMed ID: 15019315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The Low-pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study (LoGTS) study design and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients.
    Krupin T; Liebmann JM; Greenfield DS; Rosenberg LF; Ritch R; Yang JW;
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Mar; 112(3):376-85. PubMed ID: 15745762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Visual field changes after transient elevation of intraocular pressure in eyes with and without glaucoma.
    Chan KC; Poostchi A; Wong T; Insull EA; Sachdev N; Wells AP
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Apr; 115(4):667-72. PubMed ID: 17716733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM; Kim LS; Pacey IE; Cunliffe IA
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study. I. Baseline sensitivity and specificity of the frequency doubling perimeter and the GDx nerve fibre analyser.
    Heeg GP; Blanksma LJ; Hardus PL; Jansonius NM
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Feb; 83(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 15715556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 67.