These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17071020)

  • 1. Adapting judicial supervision to the risk level of drug offenders: discharge and 6-month outcomes from a prospective matching study.
    Marlowe DB; Festinger DS; Dugosh KL; Lee PA; Benasutti KM
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2007 May; 88 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S4-13. PubMed ID: 17071020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Matching Judicial Supervision to Clients' Risk Status in Drug Court.
    Marlowe DB; Festinger DS; Lee PA; Dugosh KL; Benasutti KM
    Crime Delinq; 2006; 52(1):52-76. PubMed ID: 18174915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Status hearings in drug court: when more is less and less is more.
    Festinger DS; Marlowe DB; Lee PA; Kirby KC; Bovasso G; McLellan AT
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2002 Oct; 68(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 12234644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are judicial status hearings a "key component" of drug court? Six and twelve months outcomes.
    Marlowe DB; Festinger DS; Dugosh KL; Lee PA
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2005 Aug; 79(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 16002024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Experimental Trial of Adaptive Programming in Drug Court: Outcomes at 6, 12 and 18 Months.
    Marlowe DB; Festinger DS; Dugosh KL; Benasutti KM; Fox G; Harron A
    J Exp Criminol; 2014 Jun; 10(2):129-149. PubMed ID: 25346652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Judicial supervision of drug-abusing offenders.
    Marlowe DB
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2006 Nov; Suppl 3():323-31. PubMed ID: 17357524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the long-term impact of drug court participation on recidivism with generalized estimating equations.
    Krebs CP; Lindquist CH; Koetse W; Lattimore PK
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2007 Nov; 91(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 17604918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Juvenile drug court: enhancing outcomes by integrating evidence-based treatments.
    Henggeler SW; Halliday-Boykins CA; Cunningham PB; Randall J; Shapiro SB; Chapman JE
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2006 Feb; 74(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 16551142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health and well-being outcomes for drug-dependent offenders on the NSW Drug Court programme.
    Freeman K
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2003 Dec; 22(4):409-16. PubMed ID: 14660130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of mental health court appearances in supervision.
    Redlich AD; Steadman HJ; Callahan L; Robbins PC; Vessilinov R; Ozdoğru AA
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(4):272-7. PubMed ID: 20638726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining the use of visual performance feedback in drug treatment court.
    Festinger DS; Dugosh KL; Della Porta JM
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2018 Feb; 26(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 29389171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What does self-identified drug of choice tell us about individuals under community corrections supervision?
    Clark BC; Perkins A; McCullumsmith CB; Islam AM; Sung J; Cropsey KL
    J Addict Med; 2012 Mar; 6(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 22227577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stopping the revolving door: effectiveness of mental health court in reducing recidivism by mentally ill offenders.
    Anestis JC; Carbonell JL
    Psychiatr Serv; 2014 Sep; 65(9):1105-12. PubMed ID: 24881521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adapting a substance abuse court diversion model for felony offenders with co-occurring disorders: initial implementation.
    Broner N; Nguyen H; Swern A; Goldfinger S
    Psychiatr Q; 2003; 74(4):361-85. PubMed ID: 14686460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive Programming Improves Outcomes in Drug Court: An Experimental Trial.
    Marlowe DB; Festinger DS; Dugosh KL; Benasutti KM; Fox G; Croft JR
    Crim Justice Behav; 2012 Apr; 39(4):514-532. PubMed ID: 22923854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Crime and substance misuse in adjudicated delinquent youth: the worst of both worlds.
    Walters GD
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Apr; 38(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 24127892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Prospective study of favorable factors in follow-up of drug addicted patients--apropos of 257 patients of the Cassini Center in Paris].
    Goeb JL; Coste J; Bigot T; Ferrand I
    Encephale; 2000; 26(6):11-20. PubMed ID: 11217533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act: client characteristics, treatment completion and re-offending three years after implementation.
    Evans E; Longshore D; Prendergast M; Urada D
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2006 Nov; Suppl 3():357-67. PubMed ID: 17357527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive interventions may optimize outcomes in drug courts: a pilot study.
    Marlowe DB; Festinger DS; Arabia PL; Dugosh KL; Benasutti KM; Croft JR
    Curr Psychiatry Rep; 2009 Oct; 11(5):370-6. PubMed ID: 19785978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multi-site study of the use of sanctions and incentives in mental health courts.
    Callahan L; Steadman HJ; Tillman S; Vesselinov R
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Feb; 37(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22563803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.