These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17071040)

  • 1. Angioseal versus manual compression for haemostasis following peripheral vascular diagnostic and interventional procedures--a randomized controlled trial.
    Upponi SS; Ganeshan AG; Warakaulle DR; Phillips-Hughes J; Boardman P; Uberoi R
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb; 61(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 17071040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomised controlled trial comparing StarClose and AngioSeal vascular closure devices in a district general hospital--the SCOAST study.
    Veasey RA; Large JK; Silberbauer J; Paul G; Taggu W; Ellery S; Rathore VS; Lloyd GW; Patel NR; Sulke AN
    Int J Clin Pract; 2008 Jun; 62(6):912-8. PubMed ID: 18479284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Successful reduction of surgeries secondary to arterial access site complications: a retrospective review at a single center with an extravascular closure device.
    Noor S; Meyers S; Curl R
    Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2010 Jul; 44(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 20484072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty.
    Sanborn TA; Gibbs HH; Brinker JA; Knopf WD; Kosinksi EJ; Roubin GS
    J Invasive Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 11 Suppl B():6B-13B. PubMed ID: 10745611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial.
    Xhepa E; Byrne RA; Schulz S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Cassese S; Linhardt M; Ibrahim T; Mehilli J; Hoppe K; Grupp K; Kufner S; Böttiger C; Hoppmann P; Burgdorf C; Fusaro M; Ott I; Schneider S; Hengstenberg C; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A;
    EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 24952057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of the Duett sealing device on quality of life and hospitalization costs for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures: Results from the Study of Economic and Quality of Life substudy of the SEAL trial.
    Zhang Z; Mahoney EM; Gershony G; Ellis S; Saucedo JF; Talley JD; Feldman T; Weintraub WS
    Am Heart J; 2001 Dec; 142(6):982-8. PubMed ID: 11717601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Efficacy of hemostatic puncture closing device for hemostasis and early ambulation after coronary angiography and angioplasty: results of a multicenter trial].
    Magosaki N; Hosoda S; Kawagishi N; Yamaguchi T; Sakatani H; Haze K; Itagane H; Otsuka M; Nobuyoshi M; Yokoi H
    J Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 34(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 10500973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiva Catalyst II vascular access management device in percutaneous diagnostic and interventional procedures with same-day discharge (Catalyst II trial).
    Kiesz RS; Wiernek BK; Wiernek SL; Merritt C; Ybarra T; Iwanski A; Buszman PP; Szymanski R; Martin JL; Buszman PE
    J Endovasc Ther; 2011 Feb; 18(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 21314348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Restick following initial Angioseal use.
    Applegate RJ; Rankin KM; Little WC; Kahl FR; Kutcher MA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Feb; 58(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 12552540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient tolerance and resource utilization associated with an arterial closure versus an external compression device after percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Juergens CP; Leung DY; Crozier JA; Wong AM; Robinson JT; Lo S; Kachwalla H; Hopkins AP
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Oct; 63(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 15390237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vascular complications with newer generations of angioseal vascular closure devices.
    Applegate RJ; Sacrinty M; Kutcher MA; Gandhi SK; Baki TT; Santos RM; Little WC
    J Interv Cardiol; 2006 Feb; 19(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16483343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomised controlled trial comparing the routine use of an Angio-Seal STS device strategy with conventional femoral haemostasis methods in a district general hospital.
    Behan MW; Large JK; Patel NR; Lloyd GW; Sulke AN
    Int J Clin Pract; 2007 Mar; 61(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 17313602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy and safety of the angioseal vascular closure device post antegrade puncture.
    Looby S; Keeling AN; McErlean A; Given MF; Geoghegan T; Lee MJ
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(3):558-62. PubMed ID: 18253787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. USage of chitosan for Femoral (USF) haemostasis after percutaneous procedures: a comparative open label study.
    Arbel J; Rozenbaum E; Reges O; Neuman Y; Levi A; Erel J; Haskia AR; Caneti M; Sherf M; Mosseri M
    EuroIntervention; 2011 Apr; 6(9):1104-9. PubMed ID: 21518684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of a novel procedure sheath and closure device during diagnostic catheterization: the multicenter randomized clinical trial of the FISH device.
    Bavry AA; Raymond RE; Bhatt DL; Chambers CE; DeNardo AJ; Hermiller JB; Myers PR; Pitts DE; Scott JA; Savader SJ; Steinhubl S
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2008 Apr; 20(4):152-6. PubMed ID: 18398227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Entrapment of an arterial pressure catheter by a previously deployed Starclose device.
    Alameddine AK; Rousou JA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jan; 77(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 20506201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Angioseal VIP® vs. StarClose SE® closure devices: a comparative analysis in non-cardiological procedures.
    Lucatelli P; Fanelli F; Cannavale A; Corona M; Cirelli C; D'Adamo A; Salvatori FM; Catalano C
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Feb; 58(1):80-86. PubMed ID: 24309473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Arterial closure devices versus manual compression for femoral haemostasis in interventional radiological procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Das R; Ahmed K; Athanasiou T; Morgan RA; Belli AM
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2011 Aug; 34(4):723-38. PubMed ID: 21046386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Closure of the femoral artery after cardiac catheterization: a comparison of Angio-Seal, StarClose, and manual compression.
    Deuling JH; Vermeulen RP; Anthonio RA; van den Heuvel AF; Jaarsma T; Jessurun G; de Smet BJ; Tan ES; Zijlstra F
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Mar; 71(4):518-23. PubMed ID: 18307223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of the Angioseal device for femoral artery closure.
    Abando A; Hood D; Weaver F; Katz S
    J Vasc Surg; 2004 Aug; 40(2):287-90. PubMed ID: 15297822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.