BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

929 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17071088)

  • 1. Static optimization of muscle forces during gait in comparison to EMG-to-force processing approach.
    Heintz S; Gutierrez-Farewik EM
    Gait Posture; 2007 Jul; 26(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 17071088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An EMG-to-force processing approach for determining ankle muscle forces during normal human gait.
    Bogey RA; Perry J; Gitter AJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):302-10. PubMed ID: 16200754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using EMG data to constrain optimization procedure improves finger tendon tension estimations during static fingertip force production.
    Vigouroux L; Quaine F; Labarre-Vila A; Amarantini D; Moutet F
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(13):2846-56. PubMed ID: 17482624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simultaneous prediction of muscle and contact forces in the knee during gait.
    Lin YC; Walter JP; Banks SA; Pandy MG; Fregly BJ
    J Biomech; 2010 Mar; 43(5):945-52. PubMed ID: 19962703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Isometric shoulder muscle activation patterns for 3-D planar forces: a methodology for musculo-skeletal model validation.
    de Groot JH; Rozendaal LA; Meskers CG; Arwert HJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Oct; 19(8):790-800. PubMed ID: 15342151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Less is more: high pass filtering, to remove up to 99% of the surface EMG signal power, improves EMG-based biceps brachii muscle force estimates.
    Potvin JR; Brown SH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2004 Jun; 14(3):389-99. PubMed ID: 15094152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility of using EMG driven neuromusculoskeletal model for prediction of dynamic movement of the elbow.
    Koo TK; Mak AF
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Feb; 15(1):12-26. PubMed ID: 15642650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A two-step EMG-and-optimization process to estimate muscle force during dynamic movement.
    Amarantini D; Rao G; Berton E
    J Biomech; 2010 Jun; 43(9):1827-30. PubMed ID: 20206935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of mass and momentum of inertia alternation on individual muscle forces during swing phase of transtibial amputee gait.
    Dabiri Y; Najarian S; Eslami MR; Zahedi S; Moser D; Shirzad E; Allami M
    Kobe J Med Sci; 2010 Sep; 56(3):E92-7. PubMed ID: 21063155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the influence of muscle deactivation on other muscles and joints during gait motion.
    Komura T; Prokopow P; Nagano A
    J Biomech; 2004 Apr; 37(4):425-36. PubMed ID: 14996554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A fair and EMG-validated comparison of recruitment criteria, musculotendon models and muscle coordination strategies, for the inverse-dynamics based optimization of muscle forces during gait.
    Michaud F; Lamas M; Lugrís U; Cuadrado J
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 18(1):17. PubMed ID: 33509205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-correlation as a method for comparing dynamic electromyography signals during gait.
    Wren TA; Do KP; Rethlefsen SA; Healy B
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(14):2714-8. PubMed ID: 16219314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling and simulation of muscle forces of trans-tibial amputee to study effect of prosthetic alignment.
    Fang L; Jia X; Wang R
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Dec; 22(10):1125-31. PubMed ID: 17942203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of global and joint-to-joint methods for estimating the hip joint load and the muscle forces during walking.
    Fraysse F; Dumas R; Cheze L; Wang X
    J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2357-62. PubMed ID: 19699479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using computed muscle control to generate forward dynamic simulations of human walking from experimental data.
    Thelen DG; Anderson FC
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(6):1107-15. PubMed ID: 16023125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of electromyography-assisted modelling in estimating musculotendon forces during gait in children with cerebral palsy.
    Veerkamp K; Schallig W; Harlaar J; Pizzolato C; Carty CP; Lloyd DG; van der Krogt MM
    J Biomech; 2019 Jul; 92():45-53. PubMed ID: 31153626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A neuromusculoskeletal tracking method for estimating individual muscle forces in human movement.
    Seth A; Pandy MG
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(2):356-66. PubMed ID: 16513124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ankle plantar flexor force production is an important determinant of the preferred walk-to-run transition speed.
    Neptune RR; Sasaki K
    J Exp Biol; 2005 Mar; 208(Pt 5):799-808. PubMed ID: 15755878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A musculoskeletal foot model for clinical gait analysis.
    Saraswat P; Andersen MS; Macwilliams BA
    J Biomech; 2010 Jun; 43(9):1645-52. PubMed ID: 20385385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 47.