184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17071427)
1. Induction of labour at term with vaginal prostaglandins preparations: a randomised controlled trial of Prostin vs Propess.
El-Shawarby SA; Connell RJ
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Oct; 26(7):627-30. PubMed ID: 17071427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is propess a better method of induction of labour in nulliparous women.
Mukhopadhyay M; Lim KJ; Fairlie FM
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 May; 22(3):294-5. PubMed ID: 12521503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Dinoprostone slow release pessary (Propess) with gel (Prostin) for induction of labour at term-a randomised trial.
Kalkat RK; McMillan E; Cooper H; Palmer K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 28(7):695-9. PubMed ID: 19065363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Induction of labour: a comparison between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary (Cervidil) and dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin E2).
Kho EM; Sadler L; McCowan L
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 19032662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term.
Gregson S; Waterstone M; Norman I; Murrells T
BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 15777441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert (Propess) and intracervical gel (Prepidil) for the induction of labour with unriped cervix].
Grignaffini A; Soncini E; Anfuso S; Ronzoni E
Minerva Ginecol; 2004 Oct; 56(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 15531859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term.
Shetty A; Livingstone I; Acharya S; Rice P; Danielian P; Templeton A
BJOG; 2004 May; 111(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 15104606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term.
Hassan AA
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is expensive always better? Comparison of two induction agents for term rupture of membranes.
Parisaei M; Erskine KJ
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18569470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of controlled-release dinoprostone Propess for labor induction].
Mazouni C; Provensal M; Ménard JP; Heckenroth H; Guidicelli B; Gamerre M; Bretelle F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Jun; 34(6):489-92. PubMed ID: 16713322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Propess versus prostin for induction of labour in term primiparous women.
Hung CH; Chen HY; Kang J; Tai YY; Lin SY; Lee CN
J Formos Med Assoc; 2023 Aug; 122(8):785-789. PubMed ID: 36907791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.
Jozwiak M; Oude Rengerink K; Benthem M; van Beek E; Dijksterhuis MG; de Graaf IM; van Huizen ME; Oudijk MA; Papatsonis DN; Perquin DA; Porath M; van der Post JA; Rijnders RJ; Scheepers HC; Spaanderman ME; van Pampus MG; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW;
Lancet; 2011 Dec; 378(9809):2095-103. PubMed ID: 22030144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction.
Prager M; Eneroth-Grimfors E; Edlund M; Marions L
BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 18715244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Induction of labor and pain: a randomized trial between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix.
Zanconato G; Bergamini V; Mantovani E; Carlin R; Bortolami O; Franchi M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 May; 24(5):728-31. PubMed ID: 21351838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinical evaluation of controlled-release dinoprostone for cervical ripening--a review of current evidence in hospital and outpatient settings.
Rath W
J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(6):491-9. PubMed ID: 16318611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Propess outcomes for cervical ripening and induction of labour in full-term pregnancy.
Chen W; Zhou Y; Pu X; Xiao C
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Apr; 34(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 24313636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Concurrent oxytocin with dinoprostone pessary versus dinoprostone pessary in labour induction of nulliparas with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Tan PC; Valiapan SD; Tay PY; Omar SZ
BJOG; 2007 Jul; 114(7):824-32. PubMed ID: 17506788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Pharmacological induction of labour: benefits and risks].
Romanelli M; Ribiani E; Burnelli L; Luzi G; Affronti G; Di Renzo GC
Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Aug; 59(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17923826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dinoprostone vaginal slow-release system (Propess) compared to expectant management in the active treatment of premature rupture of the membranes at term: impact on maternal and fetal outcomes.
Larrañaga-Azcárate C; Campo-Molina G; Pérez-Rodríguez AF; Ezcurdia-Gurpegui M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 18231888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
