BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17072866)

  • 1. The pillars of the scapula.
    Karelse A; Kegels L; De Wilde L
    Clin Anat; 2007 May; 20(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 17072866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stability of cemented in-line pegged glenoid compared with keeled glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Rahme H; Mattsson P; Wikblad L; Nowak J; Larsson S
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Aug; 91(8):1965-72. PubMed ID: 19651956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glenoid loosening in response to dynamic multi-axis eccentric loading: a comparison between keeled and pegged designs with an equivalent radial mismatch.
    Roche C; Angibaud L; Flurin PH; Wright T; Zuckerman J
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 2006; 63(3-4):88-92. PubMed ID: 16878824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stress analysis of cemented glenoid prostheses in total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Gupta S; van der Helm FC; van Keulen F
    J Biomech; 2004 Nov; 37(11):1777-86. PubMed ID: 15388321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acromion-fixation of glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Murphy LA; Prendergast PJ
    J Biomech; 2005 Aug; 38(8):1702-11. PubMed ID: 15958228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Glenoid morphology in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: classification and surgical implications.
    Frankle MA; Teramoto A; Luo ZP; Levy JC; Pupello D
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2009; 18(6):874-85. PubMed ID: 19482489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. About the variability of the shape of the glenoid cavity.
    De Wilde LF; Berghs BM; Audenaert E; Sys G; Van Maele GO; Barbaix E
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Feb; 26(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 14504818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A biomechanical analysis of initial fixation options for porous-tantalum-backed glenoid components.
    Budge MD; Kurdziel MD; Baker KC; Wiater JM
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 May; 22(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 22999848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The macroscopic delineation of the edge of the glenoid labrum: an anatomic evaluation of an open and arthroscopic visual reference.
    Rispoli DM; Athwal GS; Sperling JW; Cofield RH
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Jun; 25(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 19501289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Observations on retrieved glenoid components.
    Hertel R; Ballmer FT
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Apr; 18(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 12728431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An experimental glenoid rim strain analysis for an improved reverse anatomy shoulder implant fixation.
    Mordecai SC; Lambert SM; Meswania JM; Blunn GW; Bayley IL; Taylor SJ
    J Orthop Res; 2012 Jun; 30(6):998-1003. PubMed ID: 22095751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Arthroscopic stabilization in patients with an inverted pear glenoid: results in patients with bone loss of the anterior glenoid.
    Mologne TS; Provencher MT; Menzel KA; Vachon TA; Dewing CB
    Am J Sports Med; 2007 Aug; 35(8):1276-83. PubMed ID: 17387219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laser morphometric analysis of the glenoid fossa of the scapula.
    Monk AP; Berry E; Limb D; Soames RW
    Clin Anat; 2001 Sep; 14(5):320-3. PubMed ID: 11754219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Locations for screw fixation beyond the glenoid vault for fixation of glenoid implants into the scapula: an anatomic study.
    Codsi MJ; Bennetts C; Powell K; Iannotti JP
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2007; 16(3 Suppl):S84-9. PubMed ID: 17239626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Center of rotation affects abduction range of motion of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
    Gutiérrez S; Levy JC; Lee WE; Keller TS; Maitland ME
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 May; 458():78-82. PubMed ID: 17308474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Hemiarthroplasty for management of proximal humeral fractures].
    Taller S; Krivohlávek M; Lukás R; Srám J; Král M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Aug; 74(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 17877943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of glenohumeral mismatch on bone strains and implant displacements in implanted glenoïds. An in vitro experimental study on cadaveric scapulae.
    Diop A; Maurel N; Grimberg J; Gagey O
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(16):3026-35. PubMed ID: 16313913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The glenoid center point: a magnetic resonance imaging study of normal scapular anatomy.
    Meyer NJ; Pennington WT; Ziegler DW
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Apr; 36(4):200-2. PubMed ID: 17515186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structure modeling of the glenoid: Relevance to shoulder arthroplasty.
    Sharma GB; McMahon PJ; Robertson DD
    J Orthop Res; 2014 Nov; 32(11):1471-8. PubMed ID: 25087587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alterations in surface geometry in retrieved polyethylene glenoid component.
    Braman JP; Falicov A; Boorman R; Matsen FA
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Jun; 24(6):1249-60. PubMed ID: 16705689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.