345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17073199)
1. Clinical performance and SEM evaluation of direct composite restorations in primary molars.
Puppin-Rontani RM; de Góes MF; Voelske CE; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 17073199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.
Rontani RM; Ducatti CH; Garcia-Godoy F; De Goes MF
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth.
da Silva Telles PD; Aparecida M; Machado M; Nör JE
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 11572489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resin-tooth adhesive interfaces after long-term function.
Hashimoto M; Ohno H; Kaga M; Endo K; Sano H; Oguchi H
Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 11699739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical, radiographic, and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of adhesive restorations on carious dentin in primary teeth.
Ribeiro CC; Baratieri LN; Perdigão J; Baratieri NM; Ritter AV
Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):591-9. PubMed ID: 10765864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Indirect pulp treatment: in vivo outcomes of an adhesive resin system vs calcium hydroxide for protection of the dentin-pulp complex.
Falster CA; Araujo FB; Straffon LH; Nör JE
Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 12064499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bond strength and failure patterns of adhesive restorations in primary teeth aged in the oral environment.
Casagrande L; de Hipólito V; de Góes MF; Barata JS; Garcia-Godoy F; de Araújo FB
Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):279-82. PubMed ID: 17073204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The micromorphologic relationship between resin and dentin in Class V restorations: an in vivo and in vitro investigation.
Ferrari M
Quintessence Int; 1994 Sep; 25(9):621-5. PubMed ID: 7568715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of shear bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of direct restorations in primary and permanent teeth--an in vitro study.
da Costa CC; Oshima HM; Costa Filho LC
Gen Dent; 2008; 56(1):85-93; quiz 94-5, 111-2. PubMed ID: 18254567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical performance of Class II adhesive restorations in pulpectomized primary molars: 12-month results.
Zulfikaroglu BT; Atac AS; Cehreli ZC
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 18505646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin and calcium hydroxide-dentin interface with resin composite restorations.
Goracci G; Mori G
Quintessence Int; 1996 Feb; 27(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 9063224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical performance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with resin-based materials. 24-month results.
Cehreli ZC; Cetinguc A; Cengiz SB; Altay AN
Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):262-6. PubMed ID: 17073200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical performance of Class II restorations in which resin composite is laminated over resin-modified glass-ionomer.
Aboush YE; Torabzadeh H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 11203844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct dentin bonding technique sensitivity when using air/suction drying steps.
Magne P; Mahallati R; Bazos P; So WS
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(2):130-8; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 18380845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Micromorphologic relationship between resin and dentin in Class II restorations: an in vivo and in vitro investigation by scanning electron microscopy.
Ferrari M; Cagidiaco MC; Mason PN
Quintessence Int; 1994 Dec; 25(12):861-6. PubMed ID: 7568696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
