345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17073199)
21. SEM analysis of marginal expansion and gap formation in Class II composite restorations.
Thonemann BM; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Hiller KA
Dent Mater; 1997 May; 13(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 9758974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of layering techniques on the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin in resin composite restorations.
Niu Y; Ma X; Fan M; Zhu S
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18614225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sealing performance of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose-Z100 in Class II restorations.
Ferrari M; Davidson CL
Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):145-9. PubMed ID: 9002788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of one versus two-layer applications of a self-etching adhesive to dentin of primary teeth: a SEM study.
Oztaş N; Olmez A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Feb; 6(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 15719073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of resin-dentine interface in primary and permanent teeth for three different durations of dentine etching.
Shashikiran ND; Gunda S; Subba Reddy VV
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2002 Dec; 20(4):124-31. PubMed ID: 12587747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical evaluation of composite resin tunnel restorations on primary molars.
de Freitas AR; de Andrada MA; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; de Sousa CN
Quintessence Int; 1994 Jun; 25(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 7938431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Resistance of cementum in Class II and V cavities to penetration by an adhesive system.
Ferrari M; Cagidiaco MC; Davidson CL
Dent Mater; 1997 May; 13(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 9758968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical and SEM study of Tetric resin composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results.
Krejci I; Besek M; Lutz F
Am J Dent; 1994 Feb; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 9115675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical evaluation of a posterior resin composite: 3-year results.
Wendt SL; Leinfelder KF
Am J Dent; 1994 Aug; 7(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 7986437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. SEM evaluation of the interaction between a three-step adhesive and dentin.
Andia-Merlin RY; Garone-Netto N; Arana-Chavez VE
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 11551007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement.
Magne P; So WS; Cascione D
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):166-74. PubMed ID: 17854617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. 2-year clinical evaluation of Class I posterior composites.
Abdalla AI; Alhadainy HA
Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):150-2. PubMed ID: 9002789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. One-year clinical evaluation of an ethanol-based and a solvent-free dentin adhesive.
Aw TC; Lepe X; Johnson GH; Mancl L
Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):451-6. PubMed ID: 15724760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Simultaneous activation technique: an alternative for bonding composite resin to glass ionomer.
Pinheiro SL; Oda M; Matson E; Duarte DA; Guedes-Pinto AC
Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 12889705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite under different conditioning methods in primary teeth.
Turgut MD; Tekçiçek M; Olmez S
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 15470873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
Pollington S; van Noort R
Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bond strength and clinical evaluation of a new dentinal bonding agent to amalgam and resin composite.
Olmez A; Ulusu T
Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):785-93. PubMed ID: 8628838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations.
Qin M; Liu H
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 16268391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
