These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17073317)

  • 1. In vivo mechanical behavior of intra-abdominal organs.
    Tay BK; Kim J; Srinivasan MA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2129-38. PubMed ID: 17073317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An efficient soft tissue characterization algorithm from in vivo indentation experiments for medical simulation.
    Kim J; Ahn B; De S; Srinivasan MA
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 18727148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of in-vivo force response of intra-abdominal soft tissues for surgical simulation.
    Tay BK; Stylopoulos N; De S; Rattner DW; Srinivasan MA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():514-9. PubMed ID: 15458143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of perfusion on the viscoelastic characteristics of liver.
    Kerdok AE; Ottensmeyer MP; Howe RD
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(12):2221-31. PubMed ID: 16126215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are in vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar?
    Gefen A; Margulies SS
    J Biomech; 2004 Sep; 37(9):1339-52. PubMed ID: 15275841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical characterization of anisotropic planar biological soft tissues using large indentation: a computational feasibility study.
    Cox MA; Driessen NJ; Bouten CV; Baaijens FP
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):428-36. PubMed ID: 16706592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical characterization of anisotropic planar biological soft tissues using finite indentation: experimental feasibility.
    Cox MA; Driessen NJ; Boerboom RA; Bouten CV; Baaijens FP
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(2):422-9. PubMed ID: 17897653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A finite element model for direction-dependent mechanical response to nanoindentation of cortical bone allowing for anisotropic post-yield behavior of the tissue.
    Carnelli D; Gastaldi D; Sassi V; Contro R; Ortiz C; Vena P
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Aug; 132(8):081008. PubMed ID: 20670057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical properties of abdominal organs in vivo and postmortem under compression loads.
    Rosen J; Brown JD; De S; Sinanan M; Hannaford B
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021020. PubMed ID: 18412507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional finite element simulations of the mechanical response of the fingertip to static and dynamic compressions.
    Wu JZ; Welcome DE; Dong RG
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 16880157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A robotic indenter for minimally invasive measurement and characterization of soft tissue response.
    Samur E; Sedef M; Basdogan C; Avtan L; Duzgun O
    Med Image Anal; 2007 Aug; 11(4):361-73. PubMed ID: 17509927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of anisotropy in viscoelastic properties of intra-abdominal soft tissues.
    Deo D; Singh TP; Dunnican W; De S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 142():77-81. PubMed ID: 19377118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic measurement of soft tissue viscoelastic properties with a torsional resonator device.
    Valtorta D; Mazza E
    Med Image Anal; 2005 Oct; 9(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 16006169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Directional, regional, and layer variations of mechanical properties of esophageal tissue and its interpretation using a structure-based constitutive model.
    Yang W; Fung TC; Chian KS; Chong CK
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):409-18. PubMed ID: 16706590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical properties of the human uterine cervix: an in vivo study.
    Mazza E; Nava A; Bauer M; Winter R; Bajka M; Holzapfel GA
    Med Image Anal; 2006 Apr; 10(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 16143559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Passive mechanical properties of large intestine under in vivo and in vitro compression.
    Higa M; Luo Y; Okuyama T; Takagi T; Shiraishi Y; Yambe T
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Oct; 29(8):840-4. PubMed ID: 17067843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo measurement of solid organ visco-elastic properties.
    Ottensmeyer MP
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():328-33. PubMed ID: 15458110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-Hertzian approach to analyzing mechanical properties of endothelial cells probed by atomic force microscopy.
    Costa KD; Sim AJ; Yin FC
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Apr; 128(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 16524328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of the mechanical response of intra-abdominal organs of fresh human cadavers for use in surgical simulation.
    Lim YJ; Jones DB; Singh TP; De S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 119():322-7. PubMed ID: 16404070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of the mechanical properties of a dermal equivalent compared with human skin in vivo by indentation and static friction tests.
    Zahouani H; Pailler-Mattei C; Sohm B; Vargiolu R; Cenizo V; Debret R
    Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 19152581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.