These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17073694)

  • 1. eHiTS: an innovative approach to the docking and scoring function problems.
    Zsoldos Z; Reid D; Simon A; Sadjad BS; Johnson AP
    Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2006 Oct; 7(5):421-35. PubMed ID: 17073694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. eHiTS: a new fast, exhaustive flexible ligand docking system.
    Zsoldos Z; Reid D; Simon A; Sadjad SB; Johnson AP
    J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Jul; 26(1):198-212. PubMed ID: 16860582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving molecular docking through eHiTS' tunable scoring function.
    Ravitz O; Zsoldos Z; Simon A
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2011 Nov; 25(11):1033-51. PubMed ID: 22076470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LASSO-ligand activity by surface similarity order: a new tool for ligand based virtual screening.
    Reid D; Sadjad BS; Zsoldos Z; Simon A
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2008; 22(6-7):479-87. PubMed ID: 18204980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ligand docking and structure-based virtual screening in drug discovery.
    Cavasotto CN; Orry AJ
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2007; 7(10):1006-14. PubMed ID: 17508934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Docking and scoring--theoretically easy, practically impossible?
    Coupez B; Lewis RA
    Curr Med Chem; 2006; 13(25):2995-3003. PubMed ID: 17073642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
    Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Theoretical and practical considerations in virtual screening: a beaten field?
    Kontoyianni M; Madhav P; Suchanek E; Seibel W
    Curr Med Chem; 2008; 15(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 18220766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Molecular Dynamics as a Tool for Virtual Ligand Screening.
    Menchon G; Maveyraud L; Czaplicki G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():145-178. PubMed ID: 29594772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Free resources to assist structure-based virtual ligand screening experiments.
    Villoutreix BO; Renault N; Lagorce D; Sperandio O; Montes M; Miteva MA
    Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2007 Aug; 8(4):381-411. PubMed ID: 17696871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhance the performance of current scoring functions with the aid of 3D protein-ligand interaction fingerprints.
    Liu J; Su M; Liu Z; Li J; Li Y; Wang R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):343. PubMed ID: 28720122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A scalable and accurate method for classifying protein-ligand binding geometries using a MapReduce approach.
    Estrada T; Zhang B; Cicotti P; Armen RS; Taufer M
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jul; 42(7):758-71. PubMed ID: 22658682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structure-based drug design: docking and scoring.
    Kroemer RT
    Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2007 Aug; 8(4):312-28. PubMed ID: 17696866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility.
    Ravindranath PA; Forli S; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ; Sanner MF
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1004586. PubMed ID: 26629955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PLHINT: A knowledge-driven computational approach based on the intermolecular H bond interactions at the protein-ligand interface from docking solutions.
    Kumar SP
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Jan; 79():194-212. PubMed ID: 29241118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improvements, trends, and new ideas in molecular docking: 2012-2013 in review.
    Yuriev E; Holien J; Ramsland PA
    J Mol Recognit; 2015 Oct; 28(10):581-604. PubMed ID: 25808539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structure-Based Prediction of G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Ligand Function: A β-Adrenoceptor Case Study.
    Kooistra AJ; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 May; 55(5):1045-61. PubMed ID: 25848966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comprehensive assessment of flexible-ligand docking algorithms: current effectiveness and challenges.
    Huang SY
    Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):982-994. PubMed ID: 28334282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.