These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17074312)

  • 1. Minimization of dependency length in written English.
    Temperley D
    Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):300-33. PubMed ID: 17074312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies.
    Phillips C; Kazanina N; Abada SH
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):407-28. PubMed ID: 15722211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating locality effects and surprisal in written English syntactic choice phenomena.
    Rajkumar R; van Schijndel M; White M; Schuler W
    Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():204-232. PubMed ID: 27428810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses.
    Chen B; Ning A; Bi H; Dunlap S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18538740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Word Order Typology Interacts With Linguistic Complexity: A Cross-Linguistic Corpus Study.
    Yadav H; Vaidya A; Shukla V; Husain S
    Cogn Sci; 2020 Apr; 44(4):e12822. PubMed ID: 32223024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Locality and expectation effects in Hindi preverbal constituent ordering.
    Ranjan S; Rajkumar R; Agarwal S
    Cognition; 2022 Jun; 223():104959. PubMed ID: 35091261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses.
    Staub A
    Cognition; 2010 Jul; 116(1):71-86. PubMed ID: 20427040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The logical syntax of number words: theory, acquisition and processing.
    Musolino J
    Cognition; 2009 Apr; 111(1):24-45. PubMed ID: 19217616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Language, thought, and real nouns.
    Barner D; Inagaki S; Li P
    Cognition; 2009 Jun; 111(3):329-44. PubMed ID: 19345937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In search of on-line locality effects in sentence comprehension.
    Bartek B; Lewis RL; Vasishth S; Smith MR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1178-98. PubMed ID: 21707210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Processing relative clauses in supportive contexts.
    Fedorenko E; Piantadosi S; Gibson E
    Cogn Sci; 2012 Apr; 36(3):471-97. PubMed ID: 22256956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Canonical word order and interference-based integration costs during sentence comprehension: the case of Spanish subject- and object-relative clauses.
    del Río D; López-Higes R; Martín-Aragoneses MT
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2108-28. PubMed ID: 22524672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity.
    Warren T; Gibson E
    Cognition; 2002 Aug; 85(1):79-112. PubMed ID: 12086714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Give and take: syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension.
    Thothathiri M; Snedeker J
    Cognition; 2008 Jul; 108(1):51-68. PubMed ID: 18258226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Anterior Midline Field: coercion or decision making?
    Pylkkänen L; Martin AE; McElree B; Smart A
    Brain Lang; 2009 Mar; 108(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 18678402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the universality of language comprehension strategies: evidence from Turkish.
    Demiral SB; Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):484-500. PubMed ID: 17336956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Linking production and comprehension processes: the case of relative clauses.
    Gennari SP; Macdonald MC
    Cognition; 2009 Apr; 111(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 19215912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subject relative clauses are not universally easier to process: Evidence from Basque.
    Carreiras M; Duñabeitia JA; Vergara M; de la Cruz-Pavía I; Laka I
    Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 20035934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct evidence of memory retrieval as a source of difficulty in non-local dependencies in language.
    Fedorenko E; Woodbury R; Gibson E
    Cogn Sci; 2013 Mar; 37(2):378-94. PubMed ID: 23362990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural basis of sentence processing in which incoming words form a sentence.
    Ikuta N; Sugiura M; Inoue K; Sato S; Horie K; Kawashima R
    Neuroreport; 2009 Mar; 20(5):531-5. PubMed ID: 19240659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.