These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17074535)

  • 21. Obstetric outcomes and congenital abnormalities after in vitro maturation, in vitro fertilization, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Buckett WM; Chian RC; Holzer H; Dean N; Usher R; Tan SL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):885-91. PubMed ID: 17906024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assisted reproductive technologies and multiple gestations.
    Wilson EE
    Clin Perinatol; 2005 Jun; 32(2):315-28, v. PubMed ID: 15922785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Perinatal results in pregnancies obtained with embryo transfer in vitro fertilization: a case-control study].
    Barros Delgadillo JC; Alvarado Méndez LM; Gorbea Chávez V; Villalobos Acosta S; Sánchez Solís V; Gaviño Gaviño F
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2006 Dec; 74(12):626-39. PubMed ID: 17539318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mode of conception of triplets and high order multiple pregnancies.
    Basit I; Johnson SN; Mocanu E; Geary M; Daly S; Wingfield M
    Ir Med J; 2012 Mar; 105(3):80-3. PubMed ID: 22558814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop.
    Reddy UM; Wapner RJ; Rebar RW; Tasca RJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):967-77. PubMed ID: 17400861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perinatal complications of assisted reproduction.
    Aboulghar MA
    Croat Med J; 2005 Oct; 46(5):751-8. PubMed ID: 16158467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Damaged babies from assisted reproductive technologies: focus on the BESST (birth emphasizing a successful singleton at term) outcome.
    Healy D;
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Mar; 81(3):512-3, discussion 526. PubMed ID: 15037392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The role of mode of conception in the outcome of twin pregnancies.
    Shebl O; Ebner T; Sir A; Sommergruber M; Tews G
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Apr; 61(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 19255561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Embryonic loss in iatrogenic multiples.
    Dickey RP
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2005 Mar; 32(1):17-27, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 15644286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is twin pregnancy necessarily an adverse outcome of assisted reproductive technologies?
    van Wely M; Twisk M; Mol BW; van der Veen F
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Nov; 21(11):2736-8. PubMed ID: 16793994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the upstate: reducing the risks of multiple births.
    Miller PB; Forstein DA; Usadi RS; Lessey BA; Higdon HL; Boone WR
    J S C Med Assoc; 2005 Dec; 101(11):373-7. PubMed ID: 16711617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Establishment of criteria for elective single embryo transfer at day 2 or day 3 by analyzing cases with successful implantation of all embryos transferred.
    Shibahara H; Hirano Y; Okajima T; Shimada K; Kikuchi K; Suzuki T; Takamizawa S; Suzuki M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Aug; 33(4):501-5. PubMed ID: 17688618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The ART of assisted reproductive technology.
    Persson J
    Aust Fam Physician; 2005 Mar; 34(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 15799656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Would legislation imposing single embryo transfer be a feasible way to reduce the rate of multiple pregnancies after IVF treatment?
    Saldeen P; Sundström P
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Jan; 20(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 15567878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Frozen-thawed transfer cycles: are they comparable with fresh?
    Mocanu EV; Cottell E; Waite K; Hennelly B; Collins C; Harrison RF
    Ir Med J; 2008 Jun; 101(6):181-4. PubMed ID: 18700513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Monozygotic twinning associated with assisted reproductive technologies: a review.
    Aston KI; Peterson CM; Carrell DT
    Reproduction; 2008 Oct; 136(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 18577552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States.
    Stern JE; Cedars MI; Jain T; Klein NA; Beaird CM; Grainger DA; Gibbons WE;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 17445805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.
    Dickey RP
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Risk during pregnancy and birth after assisted reproductive technologies: an integral view of the problem.
    Ludwig M
    Semin Reprod Med; 2005 Nov; 23(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 16317625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences.
    Schmidt L
    Dan Med Bull; 2006 Nov; 53(4):390-417. PubMed ID: 17150146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.