BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17074541)

  • 21. Retraction notice of a previous article published in Gait and Posture.
    Robb J; Miller F
    Gait Posture; 2003 Dec; 18(3):123. PubMed ID: 14667943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.
    Wager E; Williams P
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Sep; 37(9):567-70. PubMed ID: 21486985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Correction or retraction?
    Nature; 2006 Nov; 444(7116):123-4. PubMed ID: 17093412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
    Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retraction challenges.
    Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7520):5. PubMed ID: 25279879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Letter to the editor: retraction of the Séralini et al. article.
    John B
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Mar; 65():391. PubMed ID: 24394483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Set up a 'self-retraction' system for honest errors.
    Fanelli D
    Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7595):415. PubMed ID: 27008933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Editor's note: notices of retraction.
    Shafer SL
    Anesth Analg; 2011 May; 112(5):1246-7. PubMed ID: 21451077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The characteristics of medical retraction notices.
    Snodgrass GL; Pfeifer MP
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1992 Oct; 80(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 1422502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct.
    Bosch X
    J Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 40(9):644-6. PubMed ID: 24505117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct.
    Miller DR
    Can J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 56(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 19330396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. When to retract?
    Smith R
    BMJ; 2003 Oct; 327(7420):883-4. PubMed ID: 14563721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Guest editors' note: Special issue on subgroup analysis in clinical trials.
    Wang SJ; Dmitrienko A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 24392974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Scientific integrity. Responding to possible plagiarism.
    Long TC; Errami M; George AC; Sun Z; Garner HR
    Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5919):1293-4. PubMed ID: 19265004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fraud in biomedical research--the role of journal editors.
    De Caterina R; Griffioen AW; Porreca F
    Life Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(21-22):755-6. PubMed ID: 21983417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Entire-paper plagiarism caught by software.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7214):715. PubMed ID: 18843325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A withdrawn prepublication.
    Dean PB
    Lancet; 2007 Mar; 369(9565):901. PubMed ID: 17368138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How to Act When Research Misconduct Is Not Detected by Software but Revealed by the Author of the Plagiarized Article.
    Baydik OD; Gasparyan AY
    J Korean Med Sci; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1508-10. PubMed ID: 27550475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fraud, not error, is why two thirds of biomedical papers are withdrawn.
    Roehr B
    BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6658. PubMed ID: 23033379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.