381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17075167)
1. Finite element analysis of a three-dimensional model of a proximal femur-cemented femoral THJR component construct: influence of assigned interface conditions on strain energy density.
Lewis G; Duggineni R
Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(5):319-27. PubMed ID: 17075167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of Charnley hip neck-angle inclination on the stresses at stem/cement and bone/cement interfaces.
Zaki M; Saad F; Al-Ebiary MN
Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(4):411-21. PubMed ID: 12652035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
Nicolella DP; Thacker BH; Katoozian H; Davy DT
J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1265-78. PubMed ID: 15961093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of three variables on the stresses in a three-dimensional model of a proximal tibia-total knee implant construct.
Sarathi Kopparti P; Lewis G
Biomed Mater Eng; 2007; 17(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 17264384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Geometric element analysis of fretting in a model of a modular femoral component of a hip implant.
Lewis G
Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 14757952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical aspects of degree of cement bonding and implant wedge effect.
Yoon YS; Oxland TR; Hodgson AJ; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Choi D
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18584929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Design considerations for ceramic resurfaced femoral head: effect of interface characteristics on failure mechanisms.
Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010; 13(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 19787497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cement mantle stress under retroversion torque at heel-strike.
Afsharpoya B; Barton DC; Fisher J; Purbach B; Wroblewski M; Stewart TD
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Dec; 31(10):1323-30. PubMed ID: 19879794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Finite element analysis of a cemented ceramic femoral component for the assembly situation in total knee arthroplasty].
Schultze C; Klüss D; Martin H; Hingst V; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Aug; 52(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 17691864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Ong KL; Kurtz SM; Manley MT; Rushton N; Mohammed NA; Field RE
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16877617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone-cement interface of the glenoid component: stress analysis for varying cement thickness.
Terrier A; Büchler P; Farron A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):710-7. PubMed ID: 15961203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [FE-analysis of surface stresses for the tribological system in total hip prostheses].
Behrens BA; Helms G; Pösse O; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Rittmann P; Windhagen H; Pressel T
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2006 Dec; 51(5-6):367-70. PubMed ID: 17155874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty.
Cheal EJ; Spector M; Hayes WC
J Orthop Res; 1992 May; 10(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 1569504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cemented femoral stem performance. Effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length.
Chang PB; Mann KA; Bartel DL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):57-69. PubMed ID: 9917591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of the fixation stiffness of some femoral stems of different designs.
Sakai R; Kanai N; Itoman M; Mabuchi K
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):370-8. PubMed ID: 16431001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
